Search for: "Murphy v. Murphy" Results 121 - 140 of 3,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2007, 6:01 am
I would be grateful to anyone who can send me copies of the Supreme Court briefs in Murphy v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 9:25 am
This week's Tax Notes observes that tax and constitutional law professors are having a field day with [Murphy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:00 am
The Government yesterday filed its brief in opposition to the petition for certiorari filed by the taxpayer in Murphy v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 2:00 am
Louis) has published Comment, Can the Taxman "Tax Your Tears": Murphy v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:11 pm
It is therefore refreshing to find a judicial opinion that actually applies conservative principles.Yesterday, in the case of Murphy v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 10:44 am
Today, the California Supreme Court unanimously decided Murphy v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:47 am by sally
Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure and others; Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08); [2011] WLR (D) 286 “The clauses of an exclusive licence agreement concluded between a holder of intellectual property rights and a broadcaster constituted a restriction on competition prohibited by article 101FEU of the FEU Treaty where they obliged the broadcaster not to supply decoding devices enabling access to… [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 10:00 am
Federal appellate procedure guru Howard Bashman offers his thoughts (via the WSJ Law Blog) on yesterday's decision by the panel in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 3:05 am
Circuit panel (Chief Judge Ginsburg and Circuit Judges Rogers and Brown) hears oral argument at 9:30 a.m. today in the rehearing in Murphy v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 3:00 am
Greg Germain (Syracuse) responds to Howard Bashman's comment yesterday on the decision by the panel in Murphy v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 3:00 am
Germain (Syracuse) has posted Taxing Emotional Injury Recoveries: A Critical Analysis of Murphy v. [read post]