Search for: "Murphy v. New York State Public Employees Federation et al"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee"… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee"… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
New York Civil Liberties Union; New York State Academy of Trial Lawyers; New York State Conference of Mayors and Municipal Officials et al.; New York City Bar Association; New York County Lawyers Association et al.; City of New York; New York State Trial Lawyers Association, amici curiae.SINGAS, J. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
New York Civil Liberties Union; New York State Academy of Trial Lawyers; New York State Conference of Mayors and Municipal Officials et al.; New York City Bar Association; New York County Lawyers Association et al.; City of New York; New York State Trial Lawyers Association, amici curiae.SINGAS, J. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Rev. 609 (1998) READ 620-636 Supreme Court of the United StatesRoy ROMER, Governor of Colorado, et al., Petitioners,v.Richard G. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
CalPERS, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:08 am
Kennedy International Airport in New York City from Cairo, Egypt. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 3:19 pm
In Trump et al. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
City of New York framework to analyze his takings claim. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 1:03 am
http://j.st/GuC Rock Creek Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
All is not lost however, as a number of members, including Chair Speigel have experience in better developed legal jurisdictions (with both Speigel and Opolsky having experience in New York) that have legal traditions of moving cases from inception to conclusion (on the merits) within a reasonable time. [read post]
