Search for: "Murphy v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2007, 12:21 pm
The Supreme Court's Notice of Forthcoming Filings for today says that its opinions in Murphy v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
The Court of Appeal's opinion is: Murphy v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 5:05 pm
Superior Court (State Farm Mutual Insurance), Banda v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 7:00 am
Superior Court, S119334 and Murphy v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 7:44 am
You are all familiar with the old adage that "one Superior Court Judge cannot overrule another Superior Court Judge. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:14 pm
Superior Court (4/12/12) --- Cal.4th ---, was probably the most highly anticipated Supreme Court employment law decision since Murphy v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 12:07 pm
Case citation: Murphy v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 8:11 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
Judge Murphy was the first woman appointed to the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, and she remained the only women on the court for decades. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
’ ” (Murphy v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:36 am
It is just not going to happen, as illustrated (yet again) by Judge Bledsoe's decision in County of Catawba v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:00 am
Superior Court, 40 Cal.4th 360 (2007), the Supreme Court's opinion in Gentry v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:54 am
Murphy nonetheless repeatedly did so, the trial court dismissed the lawsuit. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 6:00 am
Oral argument has been set in Murphy v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:00 pm
Superior Court (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 365 and Dunlap v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Richard Bagdasarian, Inc. 2008 WL 888524, one of the penalty/wage cases that was a companion case to Murphy v Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 C4th 1094, and checked to see if it was still pending. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 8:17 am
The second, which is probably the most eagerly anticipated wage and hour opinion in more than a year, is Murphy v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:15 pm
Hot on the heels of Gentry comes Murphy v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:13 pm
Of course, DeGorter immediately ran into the buzz saw of the principle that: ‘[o]ne superior court judge may only modify, overrule, or change the order of another superior court judge where the original order was (1) interlocutory, (2) discretionary, and (3) there has been a substantial change of circumstances since the entry of the prior order. [read post]
