Search for: "Murphy v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, ETC." Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 9:18 pm by Dana Manner
This case follows a similar decision in a Florida 1st District Court of Appeal case, known as the ”Duval Motors” or “Rogers” case (DUVAL MOTORS CO. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 11:53 am by Brian Shiffrin
  The statute (Section 2711) defines governmental entity as "a department or agency of the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof." [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
And the Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Friends, we are excited to share that the Supreme Court has just taken up Gonzalez v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am by Kelly
Murphy (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court South Carolina – SEO/Web design consultant faces contributory trademark liability for ‘Copycat’ e-commerce site: Roger Cleveland Golf v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Marie Louise
(IP Dragon) Europe Competition trumps IP in footie decoder pub brawl: Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (IPKat) (1709 Blog) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Azrights) EPO puts an end to the practice of resurrecting invalid claims in a divisional application: T 0051/08 Res iudicata in a divisional application/CANON (Kluwer Patent Blog) Greece Police arrest five in operation to shut down popular… [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
 Retransmission rights in the US: the Aero case Moving across the pond to the US, a similar question has been working its way through the District Court and Second Circuits and, following acceptance of a petition for certiorari, is due before the Supreme Court later this year. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Like the United States Supreme Court, there are few cases the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is required to hear; instead, the court decides, at its discretion, which appeals from the intermediate appellate courts it wants to hear. [read post]