Search for: "Murphy v. USA" Results 41 - 60 of 296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The 910 pages of records showed Murphy spent $11,847 on various stadium events, including: $936 at a 2018 Taylor Swift concert, $2,095 at a 2018 USA v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:56 am by Amy Howe
Murphy Oil USA – involving the intersection of two federal laws, both of which date back nearly a century. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 7:33 am
Eighth Circuit slaps down Judge Bataillon again: this time the appeals court reverses Bataillon's order granting a new trial for a crack dealer. 061240P.pdf 02/28/2007 USA v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 5:50 am by assoulineberlowe
Ed Pozzuoli, general counsel for Charter Schools USA, said there was no contract between the company and Murphy. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Murphy Oil USA, urging “the justices to affirm the same decision that, on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, it had previously asked them to review and overturn. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:45 pm by WIMS
Murphy Oil USA (Docket 10-294) [See WIMS 10/21/09]. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Murphy    Middle District of Tennessee at Columbia 08a0276n.06 Woods v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Therefore, this case is controlled by the Board’s decision in Murphy Oil USA, Inc., 361 NLRB No. 72 (2014), enf. denied 808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:15 am
Murphy Oil USA after vacating its prior panel decision that allowed Katrina victims to sue energy companies for money damages based on alleged greenhouse gas emissions causing the hurricane’s strength and resulting damage. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Murphy Oil USA, in which the court will decide whether labor laws forbid class waivers in employment contracts. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:39 am
The exciting news on the employment law front is that the Court will hear three (now consolidated) cases addressing the issue of class action waivers in the employment context.As the Petition in NLRB v. [read post]