Search for: "Murray v Nash" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
  At the end of the book, Professor Ackerman disarmingly acknowledges that he’s “fail[ed] to integrate the voices of movement activists,” but I believe the failure distorts the story he tells, for an accurate list of crucial catalysts would include many women, such as Diane Nash, Septima Clark, Autherine Lucy, Ida Wells-Barnett, Jo Ann Gibson Robinson, Ella Baker, Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, Daisy Bates, and Pauli Murray (to name just a few) as well as John… [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
  At the end of the book, Professor Ackerman disarmingly acknowledges that he’s “fail[ed] to integrate the voices of movement activists,” but I believe the failure distorts the story he tells, for an accurate list of crucial catalysts would include many women, such as Diane Nash, Septima Clark, Autherine Lucy, Ida Wells-Barnett, Jo Ann Gibson Robinson, Ella Baker, Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, Daisy Bates, and Pauli Murray (to name just a few) as well as John… [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Nash Oil & Gas, Inc., 526 F.3d 626, 631 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting and applying Phelan); Orr v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Appellate Division held that Family Court properly rejected respondent’s defense based on his refusal to read the order.Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentGeneral rule regarding downward modification of support should not be inflexibly applied where a parent quits a job for a sufficiently compelling reason            In Matter of Parmenter v Nash, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2018 WL 5875499, 2018 N.Y. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Appellate Division held that Family Court properly rejected respondent’s defense based on his refusal to read the order.Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentGeneral rule regarding downward modification of support should not be inflexibly applied where a parent quits a job for a sufficiently compelling reason            In Matter of Parmenter v Nash, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2018 WL 5875499, 2018 N.Y. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
The keynote speaker, UK Information Commissioner John Edwards will be joined by Professor Victoria Nash of the Oxford Internet Institute, Professor Lilian Edwards of Newcastle University and the Ada Lovelace Institute, Maurice Frankel of the Campaign for Freedom of Information, Alan Payne KC and Aaron Moss of 5 Essex Court and Stewart Room, NADPO’s president. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]