Search for: "Murray v. Nicol"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
On 21 April 2020, Nicol J granted summary judgment in a matter involving the online publication of covert recordings of intimate footage featuring both parties to the proceedings (BVG v LAR [2020] EWHC 931 (QB)). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:33 pm
Anna's case, or Stern v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:48 am
Way back in 1996, my wife Nicole Stelle Garnett was a young lawyer with the scrappy crew at the Institute for Justice, and participated in a challenge to the Maine tuitioning program that the Supreme Court just (finally) ruled against today in Carson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Andros v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:26 am
Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006) Murray's Lessee v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
On Monday 11 October 2021, the Labour Party named Seumas Milne, Karie Murphy, Georgie Robertson, Laura Murray and Harry Hayball as the individuals responsible for leaking the report entitled “The work of the Labour Party’s Governance and Legal Unit in relation to antisemitism, 2014-2019. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
On 24 and 25 March 2021 there was a trial in the libel case of Junejo v New Vision TV Limited before Murray J. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm
On Wednesday 22 April 2020 Nicol J heard an application in the case of Notting Hill Genesis v Ali. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 3:43 am
He appeared in many of the key cases in the development of privacy law, including Campbell v MGN, Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers, Murray v Big Pictures and Mosley v News Group. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
Murray, Vrije Universiteit – Dep. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
Here’s Why That Won’t Happen.Center for Public Integrity – Sarah Kleiner | Published: 8/31/2017 Seizing on the specter of Russian election influence, Democrats have ramped up their quixotic effort to blunt Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:27 am
Under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Daimler AG v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
Sir Andrew Nicol found that the proceedings amounted to an abuse of process and should be struck out accordingly. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
On the same day Nicol J will give judgment in relation to the reporting restrictions in R v Incedal. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
IPSO IPSO has rejected privacy complaints made against the Daily Mail, the Sun and the Daily Telegraph over pictures of Andy Murray’s baby daughter, Sofia Murray. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Cahn, University of Buffalo INTENDED AND UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF BRITISH SOVEREIGNTY AND RIGHTS DISCOURSE ACROSS THE EMPIRE PRESIDING: Nicole Hudgins, University of Baltimore Politics of Standardization: Sovereignty and the British Empire in the Middle East, Shohei Sato, St. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 9:45 am
In the recent decision in the Myriad a gene patent case (AMP v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:40 am
Louis V. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm
Saini J has dismissed the claims in libel, slander per se and malicious falsehood in George v Cannell & another. [read post]
