Search for: "MySpace, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2010, 2:12 pm
Defendants served subpoenas duces tecum on three social networking websites: Facebook, Media Temple, Inc, and MySpace, Inc. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:27 am
MySpace warns users . . . that their profiles and MySpace forums are public spaces [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:42 pm
Hanford Sentinel, Inc., is a California case arising out of post on Cynthia Moreno’s myspace page entitled “An ode to Coalinga”. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 4:42 pm
Yahoo, Inc., 2005 WL 3005602 (D. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 9:17 pm
MySpace, Inc., No. 06-983 (W.D. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:48 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 9:37 pm
MySpace, Inc., No. 07-50345, 2008 WL 2068064 (5th Cir. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 1:58 pm
Myspace, Inc (Case No. 11-cv-1800) includes counts alleging common law claims, such as conversion, breach of contract, breach of the implied warranty of good faith and fair dealing, and invasion of privacy, along with violation of the Stored Data Communications Act [18 U.S.C. sec. 2701 et seq.] and unfair and fraudulent business practices. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 8:30 am
MySpace Inc., Circuit Judge Clement, writing on behalf of herself and Judges Garwood and Elrod, ruled that the statute protected MySpace from claims that it was negligent for not “instit[uting] and enforc[ing] appropriate security measures and policies that would substantially decrease the likelihood of danger and harm that MySpace posed to” the minor-plaintiff. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:22 pm
There you go again mentioning predators and not all sex offenders are predators...MySpace, a unit of Fox Interactive Media Inc., launched in January 2004. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 8:30 am
MySpace Inc., Circuit Judge Clement, writing on behalf of herself and Judges Garwood and Elrod, ruled that the statute protected MySpace from claims that it was negligent for not “instit[uting] and enforc[ing] appropriate security measures and policies that would substantially decrease the likelihood of danger and harm that MySpace posed to” the minor-plaintiff. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 8:05 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2009 WL 1067018 (D.Colo. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
Weis Markets, Inc., CV-09-1535 (Pa. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 8:38 am
Hanford Sentinel, Inc., et al., the California court of appeal held that Moreno cannot state a claim for invasion of privacy because her MySpace posting was available to the public. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 8:38 am
Hanford Sentinel, Inc., et al., the California court of appeal held that Moreno cannot state a claim for invasion of privacy because her MySpace posting was available to the public. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 10:20 pm
[9] Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:15 am
Steelcase, Inc., run of mill products liability case, Court allows discovery of “private” Facebook and MySpace posts: “However, contrary to Plaintiff’s claims, Steelcase contends that a review of the public portions of Plaintiff’s MySpace and Facebook pages reveals that she has an active lifestyle and has traveled to Florida and Pennsylvania during the time period she claims that her injuries prohibited such activity”. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 8:30 am
MySpace Inc., Circuit Judge Clement, writing on behalf of herself and Judges Garwood and Elrod, ruled that the statute protected MySpace from claims that it was negligent for not “instit[uting] and enforc[ing] appropriate security measures and policies that would substantially decrease the likelihood of danger and harm that MySpace posed to” the minor-plaintiff. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 8:30 am
MySpace Inc., Circuit Judge Clement, writing on behalf of herself and Judges Garwood and Elrod, ruled that the statute protected MySpace from claims that it was negligent for not “instit[uting] and enforc[ing] appropriate security measures and policies that would substantially decrease the likelihood of danger and harm that MySpace posed to” the minor-plaintiff. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 8:30 am
MySpace Inc., Circuit Judge Clement, writing on behalf of herself and Judges Garwood and Elrod, ruled that the statute protected MySpace from claims that it was negligent for not “instit[uting] and enforc[ing] appropriate security measures and policies that would substantially decrease the likelihood of danger and harm that MySpace posed to” the minor-plaintiff. [read post]
