Search for: "Myers v. Public Safety"
Results 61 - 80
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm
"] From Betzko v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Moreover, the ordinance was not a retail food safety measure and thus, was not preempted under the California Health & Safety Code because the provisions relating to single-use articles did not demonstrate legislative intent to preempt local regulation of single-use checkout bags. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm
In June Medical Services LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
If we did so the public interest would be ill served. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
Myers Company. [read post]
10 Aug 2006, 8:45 pm
Wayne Myers offers Note, Roper v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 8:11 am
” They are labeled as “patient safety work product,” and protected from public disclosure. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am
Myers Docket: 09-451 Issues: (1) Whether probable cause is required to conduct strip searches that further the overwhelmingly important interests of jail security and safety; and (2) whether the law governing visual, non-body cavity searches of jail detainees was sufficiently settled to be considered “clearly established” at the time of the search in question. [read post]
28 May 2021, 10:44 am
M., Myers, G., Dubusky, L. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Until 2009, she was a partner and then of counsel at the law firm of O'Melveny & Myers, where she was a member of the Supreme Court and appellate practice, specializing in public interest litigation. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 1:16 pm
Myers released a decision on the issue of in person discoveries vs. virtual discoveries in WORSOFF v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Kresge Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 3:02 pm
The Supreme Court wil shortly hear these arguments in the context of a drug case and FDA preamble that attempts to grant immunity, when Wyeth v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:52 am
Shikada v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 6:02 am
In the 2003 case of Matalon v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Garrison v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
” For an example, Jackson cited the president’s “exclusive power of removal in executive agencies” that was upheld in Myers v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
(It is also of note that the judge in Capic also instructed the parties in how to conduct themselves to conform to health and safety requirements, including working from home and not in their offices (paras. 4 and 5).) [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
When this is weakened, both commercial marketing and public safety efforts are weakened as well. [read post]
