Search for: "Mylan Pharmaceuticals Incorporated" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2022, 8:27 am by Dennis Crouch
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 21-1567 [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 10:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 21-1567, also focuses on the written description requirement – asking what level of disclosure is necessary for a claim limitation requiring a therapeutic treatment to be “effective. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
Eco-Gel 200 ultrasound gel has been recalled by Eco-Med Pharmaceutical, Inc. due to bacterial contamination. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:18 am by Christine A. Gaddis
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., a patent infringement matter brought under the Hatch-Waxman statute and filed before the TC Heartland decision, the parties did not dispute that, in light of TC Heartland, the defendant, a West Virginia corporation, could not be said to “reside” in Delaware. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 16-332 (effectively extending exclusivity to 12 1/2 years; complement to the Sandoz petition) Mylan Pharmaceuticals, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Dennis Crouch
., No. 15-998 (follow-on to SCA) Safe Harbor: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
., No. 15-998 (follow-on to SCA) Safe Harbor: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
., No. 15-1189 (unreasonable restraints on downstream uses) Obviousness: Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm by Dennis Crouch
Guest Post By: Paul Dietze and Mini Kapoor, Haynes and Boone, LLP[1]  On March 18, 2016, the Federal Circuit held that Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am by Dennis Crouch
., No. 15-1189 (unreasonable restraints on downstream uses) Obviousness: Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
., No. 15-1189 (unreasonable restraints on downstream uses) Obviousness: Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
., No. 15-1189 (unreasonable restraints on downstream uses) Obviousness: Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Qualcomm Incorporated, No. 15-1092 (“Whether and under what circumstances an inconsistency in expert testimony permits a court to set aside a jury verdict and grant the losing party judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
Apotex Inc., No. 15-281 Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]