Search for: "N.C. Department of Justice" Results 81 - 100 of 405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2012, 1:50 pm by legalinformatics
Robinson, in which a death sentence was vacated on the ground that the prosecution’s peremptory challenges were racially motivated, in violation of North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act [N.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:17 am
Lewis Lobby, and a contradictory position through the Justice Department argument that Rita's sentence was valid. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:17 am
Lewis Lobby, and a contradictory position through the Justice Department argument that Rita's sentence was valid. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:50 am by Todd Janzen
The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently issued a press release stating that "Freedman Farms, Inc. and its president, William B. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
" "Where the facts and law allow, the Justice Department will pursue individuals responsible for illegal conduct just as vigorously as we pursue corporations," said Tony West, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division of the Department of Justice. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
The News & Observer has a story about Scalia hosting N.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
The News & Observer has a story about Scalia hosting N.C. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
In the Obama Administration’s first formal response to constitutional challenges to the new birth control mandate, Justice Department lawyers have argued that the federal courts should stay on the sidelines of the dispute at least until a new attempt at compromise is finally worked out, more than a year from now. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:08 am by Sheppard Mullin
On March 23, 2010, for the first time in the history of the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), a foreign defendant, Mr. [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:35 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
In court Monday, a prosecutor from the Department of Justice called that decision irrelevant to their criminal case and argued against the jury being able to hear about it. [read post]