Search for: "NA v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 974
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
Policy restricted powers Regina (NA (Iraq)) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Others Court of Appeal “Instructions to entry clearance officers that S-series passports were no longer acceptable as evidence of identity and nationality amounted to an unlawful restriction on their powers to decide in individual cases whether such a passport met requirements. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 6:46 am by Jamison Koehler
  Must the officer also jeer at you with the childhood taunt of “na na na na boo boo”? [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 6:46 am by Jamison Koehler
  Must the officer also jeer at you with the childhood taunt of “na na na na boo boo”? [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:46 am by tracey
Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) v JP Morgan Chase Bank NA (Case C-144/10);  [2011] WLR (D)  188 “The exclusive jurisdiction, conferred by article 22(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, on the courts of the member state in which a company had its seat, was confined to proceedings whose principal subject matter comprised the validity of the constitution, the nullity or the dissolution of the company, or the validity of the decisions of… [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Appellant Supplemental Brief Na’i Aupuni Answer Brief Na’i Aupuni Supplemental Brief Office of Hawaiian Affairs Answer Brief Office of Hawaiian Affairs Supplemental Brief Opening Brief State Supplemental Brief Oral argument video and audio. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:52 am by Zachary Spilman
On Wednesday 2 November CAAF will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:29 pm by Zachary Spilman
CAAF heard oral argument last week in the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Zachary Spilman
CAAF will hear oral argument in a second case on Tuesday, January 24: United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 5:15 pm
Audio to Wednesday's oral argument in United States v. [read post]