Search for: "NATION v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 46,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2012, 1:37 pm
On June 28, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 5:16 am
On November 10, 2010, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a case (Flores-Villar v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:41 am
Regina (Abdi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Khalaf) v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 242; [2011] WLR (D) 78 “In deciding whether a foreign national facing deportation had been detained for too long it was right to consider what had happened since the start of the detention and to consider all the relevant factors in the context of the time so far spent in detention and to ask in all the circumstances whether this was a reasonable time for… [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 7:06 am
Here are the materials in Seneca Nation of Indians v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:26 am
The 62-page opinion essentially proceeds on two parallel tracks, one addressing Counts I-III, claims brought by private plaintiffs, primarily State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas (SNB), and the other Counts (IV-VI) that were principally brought by the States (the court noted that the private plaintiffs, while joining those counts, made no attempt to establish standing in their own right). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:13 am
United States rely on the 1876 decision of Chy Lung v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
United States, in Trump v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:04 am
Read the opinion The post LATONJA CARRERA v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 6:36 am
Here is the complaint in State of Washington v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:28 am
Regina (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another Queen’s Bench Division “An English court would not make a declaration that existing national legislation was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights where there was a ruling by a Scottish court in respect of the same or similar legislation and where the government was in [...] [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm
The post United States Supreme Court Dismisses Mississippi v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:14 am
Regina (A) v Secretary of State for Health Court of Appeal “A failed asylum seeker was not ordinarily resident in the United Kingdom so as to be entitled to free treatment by the National Health Service. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
R (Abdullah) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] WLR (D) 185 “Directions for the removal of a person who had no right to remain in the United Kingdom following the dismissal of his claim for asylum were not suspended by virtue of s 78 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 and [...] [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:49 am
The Second Circuit reversed a sentence on the ground that it had been impermissibly based on the defendant's national origin.The decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
The Second Circuit held that a District Court's consideration of a criminal defendant's national origin in sentencing renders the sentence invalid.The decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:09 am
R (Low) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 35 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 15 “A worker, who was a national of a non member state, sent by a service provider exercising its freedom to provide services pursuant to art 49 EC, from one member state to another had to be lawfully resident [...] [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 8:40 am
C|M|LAW’s own Professor Chris Sagers’ new book United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 6:40 am
Here are the materials in Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:33 am
The post Case Preview: Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:38 am
AS and DD (Libya) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A foreign national who challenged a deportation order made on national security grounds had to show substantial grounds for believing that if he was returned he would face a real risk of being subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment in contravention of article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
