Search for: "NATION v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 46,365
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
This flawed scope suggests no direct link between the law’s restrictions and the stated security concerns, weakening its justification under strict scrutiny. [read post]
7 May 2024, 11:46 am
” Case No. 01001976380 | The People of the State of California v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:47 am
Machinists v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
7 May 2024, 8:47 am
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard): On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:29 am
Specifically, right of publicity laws across the nation typically provide that individuals have a property right in the use of their name, photograph, and likeness. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
Per another Supreme Court precedent, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
Elrod v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:58 am
., v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Although Jewish individuals were not considered a nation, they were heavily affect [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am
The Supreme Court’s view was that the universal recognition and enforcement of foreign decisions leads to the superiority of foreign nations over national courts. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:33 am
See Loretto (temporary physical invasions should be assessed by case-specific factual inquiry); Tahoe–Sierra (duration of regulatory restriction is a factor for court to consider); National Bd. of YMCA v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
McCabe (concluding that the classification of marijuana was not rational); State v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
The FT Group’s Chief Executive stated that it is right, “that AI platforms pay publishers for the use of their material. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm
[V]iolent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is. [read post]
5 May 2024, 11:09 am
In-custody transportation through the United States Marshals can take many weeks, with long bus rides during which defendants are shackled, and overnight stays are often in county jails and other contract facilities ill-equipped to address the needs of our incompetent clients.This week, however, the Sixth Circuit gave teeth to the statutory requirements of the Speedy Trial Act in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:13 am
The Supreme Court, in its recent Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
