Search for: "NATION v. STATE"
Results 61 - 80
of 46,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2015, 9:05 am
<> National Association of Home v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 8:55 am
<> National Parks Conservation v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 2:29 am
R (National Grid Gas plc) v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:56 am
Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de L’emploi (ONEm) (Case C-34/09); [2011] WLR (D) 81 ”A third country national with dependent children who were European citizens, had, pursuant to article 20FEU of the FEU Treaty, a right of residence in the member state of residence and nationality of those children and was entitled to a work permit in so far as this enabled the children to enjoy the substance of the rights attaching to the status of… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:13 am
Here is the complaint in Tolowa Nation v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:52 am
HR (Portugal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 371; [2009] WLR(D) 144 “The time during which an European Economic Area national was serving a sentence of imprisonment in the United Kingdom was not to be included when calculating whether he had resided for a continuous period of at least ten years [...] [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
AS (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 32; [2009] WLR (D) 194 “The provisions of s 85(5) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, which provided that an immigration judge hearing an appeal against a refusal of entry clearance could only have regard to the circumstances appertaining at the time [...] [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:50 pm
MishkinBriefs were filed last week by the “private” and “state” appellants in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 11:41 pm
Department of the Interior v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:58 am
ZT (Kosovo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department House of Lords “When a claim for asylum had been rejected as clearly unfounded under section 94(2) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, and the claimant made further submissions, the Secretary of State for the Home Department had to consider whether those further submissions created [...] [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 2:17 am
ZT (Kosovo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 6; [2009] WLR (D) 32 “When an applicant whose claim for asylum was refused as ‘clearly unfounded’ under s 94(2) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 made further submissions, the Secretary of State had then to go on to consider whether those [...] [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:31 am
CONCLUSION Plaintiff has demonstrated that, during the period from February 22, 1974, to September 30, 1992, defendant breached its fiduciary duties to the Nation by mismanaging the Nation’s trust assets and other funds. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:29 am
United States, will impact families around the country, and plans for the national week of action with national and grassroots partners... [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 8:58 am
State of Arizona v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:53 am
<> State of Alaska v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 8:42 am
Here: Wisconsin v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 7:49 am
Abdirahman v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Abdirahman v Leicester City Council and another: Ullusow v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions “When considering applications made by EU and EEA nationals living in the United Kingdom for social security benefits who were neither economically active nor self-sufficient, lawful presence in the United Kingdom was not to be equated with a "right to reside" within the… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
Nov. 24, 2008) A national bank can be a citizen of two states for CAFA diversity purposes when its principal place of business and the main office designated in its articles of association are located in different states. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:18 am
On May 5, 2015, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Wiersum v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
Clearing House Association [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that the National Bank Act (NBA) [12 USC § 484(a) text] and 12 CFR § 7.4000 [text] do not prevent a state from enforcing fair lending laws against national banks. [read post]
