Search for: "NATION v. STATE" Results 121 - 140 of 46,371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Frey: cert petition and appendix – penobscot nation v. frey.pdfDownload Here is the petition in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
A state court decision on the leadership dispute is here. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:37 pm by John W. Arden
’s motion to dismiss trademark infringement and dilution claims brought by the Navajo Nation (The Navajo Nation v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 3:30 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: Plaintiffs‐Appellants, the Cayuga Nation, a federally recognized Indian tribe, and individual officers, employees, and representatives of the Cayuga Nation, filed this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (David N. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix.
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34 NY3d… [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:07 am by michael
Regina (Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Court of Appeal “It was for the court to determine whether a government claim of serious damage to national security required parts of the reasons in its judgment should be left out. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 2:33 am
R (Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (4) [2009] EWHC 152 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 36 “A novel issue, the striking of a balance between the public interest in national security and the public interest in open justice, the rule of law and democratic accountability, lay at the heart of the [...] [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:01 am
Chief Constable of Humberside Police and others v Information Commissioner (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1079; [2009] WLR (D) 302 “In relation to the national police computer it was for the data controller to determine the purposes for which data was processed. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am by sally
R (Daley-Murdock) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 161; [2011] WLR (D) 56 “It was contrary to the policy and objects of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 to impose an obligation on the Secretary of State when refusing an overstayer’s application for leave to remain to make an appealable removal decision at the same time which would confer a right of appeal. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:43 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Mishkin The CFPB’s constitutionality is back before the D.C. federal district court, with the private plaintiffs in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:56 pm
Answer:          Yes, According to the United States Supreme Court in Watters, Commissioner v. [read post]