Search for: "NATIONS v. STONE"
Results 241 - 260
of 959
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Geoffrey Stone is the Edward H. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 9:56 am
That's because private parties--and especially their counsel--try to leave no stone unturned. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
See Mark Weisbrot’s November 8th article for The Nation. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Schwartz challenges McCulloch’scanonical status a foundation stone in the building of American constitutional law. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Only in the 1940s did Chief Justice Stone resuscitate the nationalist use of McCulloch, with assists from historians Thomas Reed Powell and Charles Beard. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
The test to be applied to national security cases is, as Stone points out, the Pentagon Papers version of the clear and present danger test (per Stewart “direct, immediate and irreparable damage to our Nation or its people”). [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 10:12 am
William V. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Walker, Jr., op. cit., citing Payne v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm
The UK is sixth – with 40% of the requests being on the grounds of “national security”. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
Consider Yick Wo v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm
Sean Wilentz, in Rolling Stone (via HNN) on Why We Must Impeach. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:15 pm
Frontier Stone, LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
A view from the Mary Quantexhibition at the V&AOn Monday evening, the Victoria & Albert Museum saw over two-thousand attendees pour through its marble and tiled halls for AIPPI's Cultural Evening. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:07 pm
Although not directly an issue of nationality, it is reasonable to assume that EU nationals are more likely first to disclose their designs in the EU, and therefore to benefit from UCD protection under a narrow interpretation of Article 11. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:41 am
The chapters will, in turn, foreground gender and the sexual slander of women; group defamation – or, the protection of individual v. community; and biography, reputation and the (post)imperial nation. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
Does the NSC staff consistently over-reach—and does its overreaching tend to produce worse national security outcomes? [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 1:57 pm
At the time, I predicted that other state bars would fall in line behind the opinion, so eventually the Texas rule would prevail across the nation. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 11:46 pm
ACCC v Birubi Art Pty Ltd (in liquidation) The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) commenced action against Birubi Art Pty Ltd (in liquidation) back in 2018 for making false claims that its tourists souvenirs, including didgeridoos, boomerangs, message stones and bull-roarers, all painted in Indigenous styles, were made in Australia and hand painted by Indigenous persons, when this was not the case. [read post]
