Search for: "NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CO. v. CORPORATION COMMISSION" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
Such funds are covered by the Securities Exchange Act (1934 Act) and are required to file disclosures with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), just like other publicly traded companies. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Don Cruse
Maximino Garza, No. 10-0435 October 5, 2011 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 1:34 pm by John McFarland
Marshall also addresses the proper interpretation of an earlier Supreme Court case of interest to royalty owners, Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
  The city had completely ignored the potential environmental impacts from building more parking supply, which would likely lead to more cars, more congestion, more air pollution, and more greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Click Here Pacific Pipelines to pay penalty for oil spill. - Eric Watkins, Oil & Gas Journal, January 25, 2010 The US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said Pacific Pipeline Systems LLP, a Long Beach, Calif. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Seth Borenstein, The Associated Press, December 6, 2009 With the world losing the battle against global warming so far, experts are warning that humans need to follow nature’s example: Adapt or die. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
EPA settles with the GATX Corporation for failing to notify authorities after 2008 ammonia release. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]