Search for: "NEW JERSEY v. T.L.O"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2017, 4:45 am
Wisconsin, 483 U.S. 868, 873 (1987) (quoting New Jersey v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 10:57 am
The Supreme Court directly addressed this issue in New Jersey v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:57 am
The Supreme Court directly addressed this issue in New Jersey v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:40 am
He confirmed that he owned both the laptop and the Playstation, that he took them to Colombia and intended to return with them, that he had planned to travel to New York the morning after he returned to Puerto Rico but never did so, and that his trip to Colombia and New York were paid for by Sardí.U.S. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:12 am
In a pivotal 1985 Supreme Court case, New Jersey v T.L.O, a student caught smoking cigarettes was arrested after a search of her purse for cigarettes unveiled drugs and drug paraphernalia. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:40 am
Acton, 515 U.S. 646, 655 (1995) (quoting New Jersey v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:01 am
New Jersey v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:24 am
The judge noted that in New Jersey v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Supreme Court in their New Jersey v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:12 pm
Further, Alford and Camreta urge the Court to apply the two-pronged standard announced in New Jersey v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 2:55 pm
’” Id. at 931 (quoting New Jersey v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:42 pm
In holding the interrogation to be an unconstitutional seizure, the Ninth Circuit Court distinguished the case from the 1985 Supreme Court case New Jersey v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 6:22 am
The Court first articulated a “special needs” test in New Jersey v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 7:00 am
(New Jersey v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 10:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court held in a case called New Jersey v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:04 am
State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
Code §§ 22.1-79, 22.1-125; compare New Jersey v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 6:06 am
Ed. 2d 976 (1995), that the common law knock-and-announce rule was also a "'command of the Fourth Amendment.'" Id. at 931 (quoting New Jersey v. [read post]
