Search for: "NEW v. TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA" Results 121 - 140 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Coates
Property laws encouraged speculation and squatting; loose immigration laws contributed to pressure on Indian lands; and legal frameworks provided for the distribution of treaty lands to individuals and created federal territory (in Oklahoma) that made Removal possible. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 11:16 am by David Kopel
  He lived with  his brother Peter in a mining camp in the Choctaw Nation, in what was then the federal Indian Territory of Oklahoma. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal case law in Oklahoma (as well as New Mexico, Colorado, and Wyoming) favors tribal sovereignty when a federal law, like the NLRA, is silent about its application to Indian nations or their enterprises. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am by Clara Altman
Charles, Oklahoma City: What the Investigation Missed-- And Why it Still Matters (William Morrow) ("The great value of "Oklahoma City" is not that it solves a mystery but that it reveals the limits, and vulnerabilities, of a no-expense-barred government investigation").And some food for thought: The New York Times has Dwight Garner's review of Tyler Cowen, An Economist Gets Lunch: New Rules for Everyday… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
  So far as books by Justices are concerned, this new offering is more refined, extensive, and current than what had appeared previously in Fenton Martin and Robert Goehlert’s The U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Bill Raftery
However, that effort was struck down by Federal courts only a day or two after the election (Awad v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm by Holly Doremus
Bandza, In Brief, South Coast Air Quality Management District v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm by Nietzer
It was enacted in 32 United States jurisdictions: Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:08 pm by Bridget Crawford
The Cherokee Nation issued a news release (here) stating that it may appeal the decision. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
“[T]he Due Process Clause may not readily be wielded as a territorial shield to avoid interstate obligations that have been voluntarily assumed. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court in 1976 to reinstate the death penalty in Gregg v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
I say State and Territory, because all the legislation is State (or Territory) based and there is no uniform Commonwealth legislation.In Queensland, protection orders can be obtained under the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 1989 which, since 2003, has extended to same sex couples. [read post]