Search for: "NICHOLAS S. v. ADES, et al." Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm
” The agreements at issue in this lawsuit, Champion et al. v. 1-800 Contacts Inc., relate to keyword advertising, which is when companies purchase words or phrases (keywords) that trigger the display of an advertisement when entered into a search engine like Google or Bing. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by Laura Valade
Thompson/Murrietta, et al., 1 CA-SA 16-0051 (May 31, 2016) For precise language, read the court’s original opinion. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
Austal USA, L.L.C. (15-CA-16552, et al., 15-RC-8394; 349 NLRB No. 51) Mobile, AL March 21, 2007. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
Dunner (Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP) spoke on "Patent Eligibility: Coping with Alice, Mayo, Myriad, Bilski, et al. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Watters, 2017 QCCA 1315Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), Montréal, 500-10-005970-155Décision de : Juges Nicholas Kasirer, Jean-François Émond et Catherine La Rosa (ad hoc)|Date : 5 septembre 2017 (jugement rectifié le 5 septembre 2017) PÉNAL (DROIT) — infraction — infractions routières — infractions au Code de la sécurité… [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Conseil québécois sur le tabac et la santé, 2019 QCCA 358Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), Montréal, 500-09-025385-154 et autresDécision de : Juges Yves-Marie Morissette, Allan R. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
The co-authors are Nicholas Johnson (Fordham), Michael O’Shea (Oklahoma City), George Mocsary (Connecticut), and me.Below the fold is the full Table of Contents and Preface for the book. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:36 am by Rachael Vaughn
Policy et al., A Patent System for the 21st Century (Stephen A. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]