Search for: "NICHOLS v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES"
Results 21 - 29
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
As anticipated, and affirmed in Economou v de Freitas [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) (see our blog here), the new section 4 defence is being interpreted broadly in line with the principles of the common law ‘Reynolds’ privilege (although there remains some debate between practitioners as to the level of importance to be attributed to each of the old ‘Reynolds criteria’ – Lord Nicholls’ checklist for good practice – in view… [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Department of Veterans Affairs (Retaliation)Cavalier v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:44 am
418
A8826
Schimminger (MS) -- Relates to the specialty pharmacy program BLURB : Soc Serv. specalty pharmacy pgm Last Act: 09/11/09 signed chap.418419
A903
Gottfried (MS) -- Provides for review by the department of health of policies and practices regarding HIV, AIDS and HCV at correctional facilities BLURB : Pub Heal. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
SebeliusCourt: U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 11-1058, 11-1057 September 8, 2011 Judge: Motz Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Health Law The Commonwealth of Virginia brought suit against the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, challenging one provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
This approach directly contradicts the understanding set out by Lords Nicholls and Hobhouse in Reynolds to the effect that the defence applies only to erroneous statements of fact. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Rather, what primarily animates my commitment to public service is the continued worthiness of the liberal vision of a just society. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am
Patricia Zavala, employment and legal services director for the Workers Defense Project, [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Douglas wrote: “Books must serve as powerful agencies of social, economic, or political reform. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
