Search for: "NICHOLS-MORRIS CORPORATION v. Morris"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
The courtroom asymmetry threatened by Harrison’s proffered testimony was that plaintiffs’ counsel could comment upon defendants’ lobbying, but defense counsel had no equivalent opportunity to comment upon the lawsuit’s extensive rent seeking.[10] [1] Nichols v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm
Bell v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 6:17 am
This post is based on a Morris Nichols publication by Mr. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:14 am
In addition, CalSTRS updated its corporate governance principles noting that it would oppose any proxy access formula more stringent than 3%/3-years. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:42 am
In Salamone v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
This son of a Scottish Presbyterian minister, and former law professor and SEC chairman, wrote fifty-one books on a wide variety of topics ranging from foreign policy to psychiatry, from corporate reorganization to environmentalism, and from stare decisis to manifest destiny. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 am
Nichole Eckert was a therapist at ATC. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
The “McLibel” litigation illustrated the inequality of arms when two individuals faced a massive libel claim brought by multinational corporations. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:58 pm
Also on the panel are Gregory Varallo of Richards, Layton & Finger, Frederick Alexander of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Lawrence Hamermesh of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance and Jessica Zeldin of Rosenthal Monhait & Goddess. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
Ltd v Underworks Ptd. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 6:42 am
Priest of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.) [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]