Search for: "NIX v. GREEN" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2010, 4:47 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We forgot. - Philadelphia LEED AP Shari Shapiro on her Green Building Law Blog A Day in the Life of an Appellate Lawyer - Roanoke appellate lawyer Jay O'Keeffe of Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore on his blog, De Novo The Evidence Increases on False Confessions - Nashville attorney Rob McKinney on his Nashville Criminal Law Report Diagnostic Errors- An Often Overlooked but Common and Dangerous Type of Medical Error - Andy Green of Nix Law Group on the… [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 4:49 am
Color this applicant blue after the USPTO nixed its five applications to register various pastel colors (blue, green, orange, purple, and yellow) for "disposable pipette tips fitted with a customizable mounting shaft," finding that the proposed marks are not inherently distinctive, lack acquired distintinctiveness under Section 2(f), and are functional under Section 2(e)(5). [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:21 pm by Tony Mauro
One candidate was nixed because he had run for office as a Green Party candidate. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
Inc (Chicago IP Litigation) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Argonne Battery Tech – Argonne is a governmental green patent licensing success story (Green Patent Blog) Becton Dickinson – Another false marking case transferred – false marking defendants now 10 out of 11: Tex Pat, LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
Winfrey (Copyright Litigation Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB’s dismissal of CITIBANK’s opposition to CAPITAL CITY BANK (TTABlog) (IPBiz) District Court E D Louisiana upholds TTAB’s ORCHID CREAM VANILLA snowball decision (TTABlog) TTAB nixes Powertech’s HYBRID GREEN mark (Green Patent Blog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Blackhorse – TTAB issues pre-trial order in new REDSKINS cancellation battle:… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm by Stephen Page
Federal Magistrate McGuire thought that the appropriate amount that the husband should receive was nought, nil, nix, zero or zip, or as the Full Court said:The effect of the order made by the Federal Magistrate was that the Husband only received his superannuation interest of $1,500.00 or 0.17 per cent of the net assets of the parties. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch)   Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat)   India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force – ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP)   Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for Protecting… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch) Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat) India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force - ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for Protecting Cinematographical Creations (1993) &… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch)   Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat)   India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force – ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP)   Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]