Search for: "NO Gas Pipeline v. FERC"
Results 1 - 20
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2017, 12:22 pm
., v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 6:50 am
In National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 9:05 pm
Circuit August 24 in Sierra Club v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 12:12 pm
In PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 12:02 pm
In PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:40 pm
In Birckhead v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm
FERC, in which the petitioners challenged the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC”) environmental review of a natural gas pipeline project.[1] Although the court ultimately rejected the challenge, the court suggested in dicta that FERC should do more to obtain information on… The post NEPA Review of Pipeline Project Upheld by D.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
” See PennEast Pipeline Co., LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 8:37 am
FERC has adopted in Order No. 690 an interim rule on the applicability of standards of conduct to interstate natural gas pipelines; the placeholder rule responds to a US Appeals Court decision in National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:38 am
The Court’s decision overturns the project’s federal approval and returns the issue to FERC to complete the necessary greenhouse gas analysis (Sierra Club et al. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 8:36 am
If both criteria are satisfied, FERC will, as in this instance, issue a certificate authorizing the pipeline’s construction, and that certificate also empowers the certificate holder to exercise eminent domain authority under to the Natural Gas Act when necessary. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
District Court of the Middle District of Pennsylvania, holding that Columbia Gas Transmission Company, an interstate natural gas company regulated by FERC, has the right of eminent domain granted by 15 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 9:04 am
In this case the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a certificate of public convenience and necessity to Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC, conditionally authorizing the company to extend a natural gas pipeline in Maryland. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 3:06 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Gunpowder Riverkeeper’s petition seeking a review of FERC’s issuance of a conditional certificate for public convenience and necessity granted by FERC to Columbia Gas Transmission to extend a natural gas pipeline in Maryland pursuant to FERC’s s authority under the Natural Gas Act (NGA). [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:29 am
The first two concern gas pipelines. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:00 am
Read More » Tags: Damages, FERC, Natural Gas Act, Oil and Gas, Pennsylvania, Pipelines, Third Circuit [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 7:10 am
FERC et al., No. 1:17-cv-01822 (Bold Alliance v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:25 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court held 5-4 in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
Landowners who find themselves in the path of an oil or gas pipeline quickly learn that their rights are limited, and that a pipeline company granted a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity hold most of the cards. [read post]
