Search for: "NORTHERN LIGHTS v STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2015, 3:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of California (the “Northern District”) reconsidered its remand order in light of the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Rodriguez v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 2:28 pm
Following the remand in Michigan v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:32 am
On 2 December 2019, the Supreme Court heard the case of R v Hilton following certification by the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:54 am
On February 16, 2010, Northern District Judge Claudia Wilken certified a National and California class of approximately 556,639 owners of Superior or Lennox brand single-pane sealed glass front fireplaces in Keilholtz v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 12:51 am
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 6:27 pm
Murray v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:55 pm
Mapes v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:28 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California: Ravenwood School District v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 6:14 am
Godbey of the Northern District of Texas has green lighted a suit alleging taxicab companies conspired to monopolize by fixing prices that drivers must pay to operate a taxicab in certain counties in the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
In August 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “court”) reconsidered its order in the case of SEC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 2:15 pm
In August, the United States Attorney’s Office (USAO) for the Northern District of California charged a pioneer of self-driving car technology, Anthony Levandowski, with 33 counts of theft and attempted theft of trade secrets from Google under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:26 am
The Supreme Court considered and applied the test laid down in Brecknell v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 42, which determines whether the coming to light of new evidence might revive the investigative obligation under Article 2. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
Master Bell stated that he “thought long and hard about whether or not to strike out Ms O’Neill’s action in the light of this jurisprudence and came close to doing so” [46]. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:33 am
On January 25, 2010, Northern District Judge Susan Illston denied a motion to decertify waiting time claims of approximately 6000 former California employees of Polo brand stores in Otsuka v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:56 pm
State Farm Life Insurance v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 1:35 pm
In Bowen v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am
This month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois rejected Fifield’s bright line test in the case of Bankers Life and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:04 am
v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:14 am
” Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
