Search for: "NOVAK v. STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
In evaluating the possession challenge, the court noted that possession may be actual or constructive (State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
In evaluating the possession challenge, the court noted that possession may be actual or constructive (State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:14 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The Appeals court reasoned that when a general consent is given, it is “unqualified’ subject only to “reasonableness” citing United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:14 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The Appeals court reasoned that when a general consent is given, it is “unqualified’ subject only to “reasonableness” citing United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
President Barack Obama stated that “Turkey, like every country, has a right to defend its territory and its airspace” and urged Russia to redirect its efforts in Syria and to target Islamic State forces exclusively. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 3:26 am by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
First there’s a fine line between what we may feel is justified and what the language of the law states is justified. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
” The statements complained about were stated at para 42 in the reasons : (i) “There are over 100 former patients of Dr. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Sabeel Rahman, Brooklyn Law, “Transcending the New Deal Idea of the State:Managerialism, Neoliberalism, and Participatory Democracy in the Regulatory State”William Novak, University of Michigan Law School, “Beyond the Idea of the NewDeal State”New Perspectives on New Deal Social Politics Elizabeth Shermer, Loyola University of Chicago, “Indentured Students and MassHigher Education”Mark Santow, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth,… [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:46 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The Superior Court denied this argument citing the Plain Smell doctrine “Plain smell” standard adopted in State of Arizona v. [read post]