Search for: "NRDC v. EPA"
Results 1 - 20
of 171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2015, 8:50 am
<> NRDC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 12:39 am
Because EPA’s denial of NRDC’s petition is not supported by substantial evidence, we VACATE EPA’s denial of NRDC’s petition and REMAND to EPA to issue a revised response to NRDC’s petition within 120 days. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:05 am
<> NRDC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:32 pm
There were prior efforts by the NRDC to speed up the EPA's response to its petition, but they generally came to nothing. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
<> NRDC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:09 am
<> NRDC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 9:51 am
Circuit (Tatel, Srinivasan, Randolph) issued a decision in NRDC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 1:07 pm
In this case, NRDC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 12:05 pm
The National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and the Environmental Defense Center (EDC) [advocacy websites] claim that the EPA has failed to obey a court order from a 2003 case EDC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 1:03 pm
In doing so, under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:55 pm
On March 11, a panel of the Ninth Circuit (Schroeder, Silverman, Garbis (by designation)) issued a decision in NRDC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:18 am
As we noted then, the culprit is the decision in NRDC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:11 am
Chamber of Commerce (for GE) and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC, for EPA), the appellant, General Electric challenges the constitutionality of a statutory scheme that authorizes U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
However, these standards were vacated by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit after the Court found EPA’s definition of “commercial or industrial waste” conflicted with the language of the Clean Air Act in NRDC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:10 pm
Backstrom, James V. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 7:00 pm
EPA - in making regulatory law more democratic - may supersede the immediate consequences for greenhouse gas regulations.Mass v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 11:43 pm
EPA, Gonzales v Oregon, and Hamdan v Rumsfeld. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:57 am
The 8-page opinion by Chief Judge Easterbrook is NRDC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 1:28 pm
The case, NRDC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:04 pm
The EPA says it's .000497. [read post]
