Search for: "NRDC v. EPA"
Results 61 - 80
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
NRDC, in support of reconsidering prior decisions “on a continuing basis. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
NRDC, in support of reconsidering prior decisions “on a continuing basis. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:52 pm
Climate Change Negotiator Position Announcement Pacific Merchant Shipping Asso. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 9:39 am
Natural Resources Defense Council v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 9:39 am
Natural Resources Defense Council v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
NRDC may be completely unknown to most members of the public. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:49 am
EPA (NRDC II), where the D.C. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:05 am
EPA. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:56 am
(NRDC helped represent the land trusts.) [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:00 am
The SIP call will require affected states to eliminate three separate types of protection currently given to generators in connection with excess emissions during SSM events: Automatic exemptions “Director’s discretion” exemptions Affirmative defenses To a significant extent, EPA’s hands were tied by the decision in NRDC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 6:03 am
An early post from our Guest Blogger of the Month for September, Professor Diana Winters: Legal commentators have spent a lot of time this week sparring over statutory interpretation and the contrasting readings of the ACA by the Halbig and... [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 8:14 pm
David Doniger, Policy Director, NRDC Climate Center, Washington, D.C. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 9:46 am
Walker According to a Ninth Circuit decision in Natural Resources Defense Council v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 11:20 am
Because there is no current EPA test method for passive diffusive tube monitoring, as part of this action, the EPA is proposing specific monitor citing and sample collection requirements as EPA Method 325A of 40 CFR part 63, Appendix A, and specific methods for analyzing the sorbent tube samples as EPA Method 325B of 40 CFR part 63, Appendix A. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 7:54 am
Circuit held that EPA lacked authority to create affirmative defenses for SSM events, NRDC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:52 pm
EPA and Sackett v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:28 am
v=QFZQv06crPEAs you may know, EPA is not sending a witness because the witch hunters threw this panel together so quickly. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 9:52 pm
EPA (NRDC II), which was the strongest lower court decision before Summers upholding substantive probabilistic standing. [read post]
11 May 2017, 9:17 am
Across the board, green groups, like the NRDC are reporting a surge in donations. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
