Search for: "Nappy v Nappy"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Nappy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
Joa, Inc. v Fameccanica Data SpA [2017] EWHC 1251 (IPEC). [read post]
23 May 2010, 7:01 pm
Like a dog owner who believes that rubbing a dog's nose in its own poo is a "learning exercise", or who allows their kid to sit in their soiled nappies as punishment, TSSG's Patrick HIndert continues to demonstrate his "fine parenting skills" with Spencer v Hartford-9. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 6:46 am
The recent case of Nappi v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 5:54 am
Since the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Nappi, 243 F.3d 758, 766 (3d Cir. 2001). [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
In layman's terms this means that you would not call a nappy a 'baby dry' and as such the term Baby Dry is not as a whole descriptive of nappies. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 10:39 am
See People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
I Injunction available after claimed licence fees paid - PPL v JJPB I Trademark application for the devil's horn withdrawn I Jo Johnson to continue as IP Minister I UPC Order on Privileges & Immunities placed before Parliament today I Celebrate 120 years of AIPPI in Sydney I Event invitation - The Pirate Bay communicates to the public: are there any more online infringement questions to be answered? [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
Application to amend nappy patent not so watertight - IPEC holds nappy patent invalid for added matter and lack of clarityNew Kat friend, Robyn Trigg (A&O) reports on HHJ Hacon’s judgment in Curt G. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:59 am
Berryman v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:51 am
The employee was injured during a lunch break [Nappi v Regan, 186 AD2d 855]; and 3. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:27 am
According to some, this would amount to trade mark “genericide” but as InternKat Cecilia tells us, A googol of generic questions in Ninth Circuit's Elliott v Google decision were raised in this subject, ultimately deciding that the Google trade mark is still alive and well.Life as a Kat: gotta love those summer afternoon napsIn the seventh episode of the Life as an IP lawyer series, the AmeriKat brought us to Sydney, Australia to meet Wen Wu of Gilbert + Tobin. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:27 am
According to some, this would amount to trade mark “genericide” but as InternKat Cecilia tells us, A googol of generic questions in Ninth Circuit's Elliott v Google decision were raised in this subject, ultimately deciding that the Google trade mark is still alive and well.Life as a Kat: gotta love those summer afternoon napsIn the seventh episode of the Life as an IP lawyer series, the AmeriKat brought us to Sydney, Australia to meet Wen Wu of Gilbert + Tobin. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
Simplifying Community Registered Design litigation in the UK - Spin Master v PMSGuestKat Rosie Burbidge also reminds readers that there are so many hints in the recent decision Spin Master v PMS [2017] EWHC 1477 (Pat) that Mr Justice Carr wants it to get wider circulation. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
Simmons' application for the “devil's horns” trademark and contextualizes it with the usage of the very same gesture done in the music world in the past and also as a cultural gesture.Weekly Roundups: Tuesday Wonders, Sunday Surprises Image credits: Cecilia SbrolliPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 151 [week ending on Sunday 10 June] Mozart and Other Pirates I TILTing Perspectives 2017 report (1): The healthcare session I TILTing Perspectives 2017 report (2): The IP… [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 2:23 am
Simmons' application for the “devil's horns” trademark and contextualizes it with the usage of the very same gesture done in the music world in the past and also as a cultural gesture.Weekly Roundups: Tuesday Wonders, Sunday Surprises Image credits: Cecilia SbrolliPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 151 [week ending on Sunday 11 June] Mozart and Other Pirates I TILTing Perspectives 2017 report (1): The healthcare session I TILTing Perspectives 2017 report (2): The IP… [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:17 am
It’s like a life sized model of the Matterhorn made entirely out of disposable nappies, and it aint Tracey Emin we are talking about here. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:01 am
" Gaudin, 415 F.3d at 1035; see also Whallon v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 1:12 am
The Court of First Instance of the European Communities handed down its judgment in Joined Cases T-241/05, T-262/05 to T-264/05, T-346/05, T-347/05, T-29/06 to T-31/06 Procter & Gamble Company v Officefor Harmonisation in the Internal Market on Wednesday 23 May 2007. [read post]
