Search for: "Nash v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
The Appellate Division held that Family Court properly rejected respondent’s defense based on his refusal to read the order.Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentGeneral rule regarding downward modification of support should not be inflexibly applied where a parent quits a job for a sufficiently compelling reason In Matter of Parmenter v Nash, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2018 WL 5875499, 2018 N.Y. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
The Appellate Division held that Family Court properly rejected respondent’s defense based on his refusal to read the order.Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentGeneral rule regarding downward modification of support should not be inflexibly applied where a parent quits a job for a sufficiently compelling reason In Matter of Parmenter v Nash, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2018 WL 5875499, 2018 N.Y. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
Two points are worth making here; both are demonstrative of problems which beset the current state of the law. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:16 pm
Nash ((1929-1932) 16 T.C. 523.) where he said at p. 530: It is said again: “Is the State coming forward to take a share of unlawful gains? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:38 pm
Bank of Scotland plc v Rea, McGeady, Laverty [2014] NIMaster 11 The borrowers’ cases were brought by NI Housing Rights Service, here is their account of the matter. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:23 pm
” Despite the decision in Perilya v Nash [2015] NSWSC 706 there was a concern that the courts might interpret the model provision more narrowly outside of NSW. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:57 am
Smith Wheeling gulls spin and glide You’ve got no place to hide ‘Cause you don’t need one – Crosby Stills and Nash, Lee Shore Some cases are born momentous (NFIB v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
CNN stated that it was unlikely to pay for all its employees verification costs and author Stephen King voiced that he would leave Twitter if the plan goes ahead. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 4:40 pm
From Paul E. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:06 pm
(Compare Jeffries v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Saul, Assistant Clinical Professor of Law and Staff Attorney, Earthrise Law Center, Lewis & Clark Law School—Citizen Suits and Good Neighbor Agreements 12:30 pm - 1:30pm Lunch 1:30 pm – 3:00 pm Session III—Promoting CSR at the State and National Levels: Non-Financial Disclosure Mandates Moderator: Mary Ann Frantz, Partner, Miller… [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:46 am
Background David Patchak, the respondent in Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
And Perry also supported Texas’s fatally flawed lawsuit against Pennsylvania, his own home state, and three other states. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 8:42 pm
The question in R v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 6:41 am
Lentini characterized as having “a wretched state of the art. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:46 am
Visual Representations of Law and Justice in Medieval Europe” • Michael L Nash, Les Roches/Gruyères University of Applied Sciences, “A contrast in evolution: the legal framework of the British and Continental monarchies” • Heikki Pihlajamäki, University of Helsinki, “The Need of Comparative Legal History in the Nordic Countries: The Case of Early Modern Sweden” • Merike Ristikivi, University of Tartu, “Terminological turn as a… [read post]
