Search for: "Nathan Smith" Results 21 - 40 of 277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm by Jason Rantanen
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Hunt, ed (Toronto: Thomson Reuters, 2019)).Nathan B. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Walter Olson
More criticism: Brad Smith on the bill’s restrictions on discussion and coordination of expenditures on speech; Ilya Shapiro and Nathan Harvey (“If ever adopted, [HR1] would give power to one slice of Washington’s elite at the expense of American democracy’s carefully crafted checks and balances”); David A. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:02 am by Jessica Smith
Carolina Club at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Cost: Free, Lunch provided Faculty Lead: Jessica Smith, W. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am by Jason Rantanen
This past fall at the Administering Patent Law symposium at Iowa Law, Professor Colleen Chien presented an argument in favor of more intentional experimentation by administrative  agencies such, as the USPTO to test policy concepts and proposed several possibilities. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
The BBC has a news story about the recent case of Doyle v Smith entitled “Caddington Village News blogger sued for libel over fraud claims” Lexisnexis has conducted an interview of Brett Wilson Managing Partner Ian Wilson discussing the issues around using parliamentary privilege to undermine injunctions, using the recent incident involving Lord Hain as a case study. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
On 2 November 2018 Warby J handed down judgment in the libel case of Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2395 (QB). [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J will heard the final day of the libel trial of Doyle v Smith. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
The libel trial in the case of Doyle v Smith was heard by Warby J on 15 to 17 October 2018 and was adjourned part heard. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm by Dennis Crouch
Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf) Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The libel trial in the case of Doyle v Smith will begin on the same day before Warby J. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:45 am by David Stanton, Wenqing Zhao
Chris Smith, co-chairs of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, wrote to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in May to ask whether his department’s Bureau of Industry and Security was monitoring exports of technologies used to repress Xinjiang’s population, and a bipartisan group of 16 senators and representatives wrote to the White House in late August to encourage sanctions. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 10:40 am by Robert Brammer
This post is coauthored by Nathan Dorn, rare book curator, and Robert Brammer, senior legal information specialist. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:40 am by Angela Bailey
Panish Shea & Boyle LLP is proud to welcome trial and social justice attorney Jesse Creed and incoming Fellows Whitney Smith, Nadine Khedry, James Trotter and Nathan Werksman to the firm. [read post]