Search for: "National Amusements, Inc. v. Boston"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2019, 12:03 pm
Instead, he reasoned: “Baseball is an amusement, a sport, a game that . . . is not a commodity or an article of merchandise subject to the regulation of congress . . . . [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(IP Think Tank) New force in Europe – EPLAW Patent Blog (IP Think Tank) IP references left out of last-minute, weak global climate deal in Copenhagen (IP Watch) UN Climate Change Conference, Copenhagen – IP discussion (IPKat) (Spicy IP) (IP Watch) (IP Watch) (WIPO) Implementing the Development Agenda nationally: WIPO seminar (Jeremy de Beer) WIPO traditional knowledge meeting stalls, but begins to breach trust gap (IP Watch) Poverty in the developing world: Should TRIPs really… [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 6:29 am
Deutsche Bank v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IP Dragon) Copycats in China: trains, planes and ... automobiles (IP Dragon) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules Innocent Pictures ApS’ use of ‘Tivoli’ and ‘Tivoli Night’ in context of pornographic broadcasts infringes trade mark rights of Danish amusement park TIVOLI A/S (Class 46) Court finds minimal confusion in MINIMAL case (International Law Office) Europe ECJ: Promotional items do not qualify… [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
Instead, companies are being pulled toward New York City, Boston, and Chicago. [read post]
