Search for: "National Association of Clean Air Agencies, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
He said both Respondent and Petitioners mentioned the issue in footnotes with no arguments. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:26 am
(In addition to EPA, respondents opposing Massachusetts and the petitioners were the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, National Automobile Dealers Association, Engine Manufacturers Association, Truck Manufacturers Association, CO2 Litigation Group, Utility Air Regulatory Group, and ten states (MI, AK, ID, KN, NB, ND, OH, SD, TX and UT). [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
He said both Respondent and Petitioners mentioned the issue in footnotes with no arguments. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:39 am
On Tuesday the federal appeals court in Washington delivered a resounding victory for science, the rule of law, and common sense by upholding the Environmental Protection Agency’s landmark actions to start curbing the dangerous carbon pollution driving climate change. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 6:41 pm
On February 9, 2010, the Southeastern Legal Foundation, a conservative “public interest” law firm filed a Petition for Review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s December 15, 2009, “Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am
In next Wednesday’s argument in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
Environmental Protection Agency 12-1253Issue: Whether the Clean Air Act and this Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:44 pm
The Environmental Protection Agency's 'Federal Implementation Plans: Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone and Correction of SIP Approvals; Final Rule,' 76 Fed. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:22 pm
Circuit found it had no jurisdiction to review, as non-final, a preamble statement in a final rule in National Environmental Development Association’s Clean Air Project v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Environmental Protection Agency and conducted environmental compliance audits at more than 25,000 facilities nation-wide. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
Next week a rogues’ gallery of science-denying industry associations, right-wing advocacy groups, Tea Party backers, and ultra-conservative elected officials get their day in court – two days, actually – to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency’s “endangerment finding” and its other actions under the Clean Air Act to start curbing the carbon pollution that drives dangerous climate change. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
In its 2012 rulemaking, EPA excluded any consideration of costs when deciding it was “appropriate”—as required by the Clean Air Act (CAA) at 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:30 pm
In their brief summary of the case, the Appeals Court said, "The Chamber of Commerce and the National Automobile Dealers Association petition for review of a decision by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) granting California a waiver from federal preemption under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
The court also rejected the argument that the lead agency improperly relied upon mitigation measures to fit the project into the exemption (an approach rejected in Salmon Protection and Watershed Network v. [read post]
