Search for: "National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2021, 5:11 pm
“What will the SG do in National Coalition for Men v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:28 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion in National Coalition for Men v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Judge Gray Miller found that the male-only Selective Service System (SSS) violates Fifth Amendment Equal Protection principles and granted summary judgment in favor of the National Coalition for Men (NCFM) and two individual plaintiffs who brought suit challenging the constitutionality of registering only men and not women for the military draft system. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:00 am
Selective Service System, No. 20-928, and its brief is now due on April 14. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 8:44 am
Today, we joined two young men and the National Coalition For Men (NCFM) to urge the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 6:41 am
District Judge Gray Miller of the Southern District of Texas.The lawsuit was filed in 2013 against the Selective Service System by Texas resident James Lesmeister, who later added San Diego resident Anthony Davis and the San Diego-based National Coalition for Men as additional plaintiffs.... [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 6:31 am
And in National Coalition for Men v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:44 am
National Coalition for Men v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 10:39 am
The Supreme Court will not hear National Coalition for Men v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
In 2013, the National Coalition for Men (NCFM) filed its first complaint in district court; the organization alleged the Selective Service System’s disparate impacts on the basis of gender violate the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 8:47 am
The National Coalition for Men filed suit against the Selective Service System, alleging that the male-only military draft is unlawful sex discrimination. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:37 am
Supreme Court upheld male-only registration in Rostker v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:22 am
The decision deals the biggest legal blow to the Selective Service System since the Supreme Court upheld the draft in 1981. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:10 am
In March, I wrote about National Coalition for Men v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
On Monday, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in National Coalition for Men v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 1:15 pm
The case was brought by the National Coalition for Men (a mens' rights group that has long opposed male-only draft registration) and two individual men, who are required to register under current law. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
Such a decision would invalidate the present selective service system, but without forcing the government to adopt a new, gender-neutral one. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 11:21 am
Nonetheless, yesterday the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld the constitutionality of the draft registration system, in a short per curiam opinion in National Coalition for Men v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
Bring rifles and men with you. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
Selective Service System, 20-928, a couple weeks ago. [read post]
