Search for: "National Federation of Federal Employees v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 3,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
April 25, 2017), the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has joined the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and other courts in holding that athletes are not employees entitled to minimum wage and overtime time pay. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
In relevant part, § 1442(a)(1) provides that `[a] civil action . . . that is commenced in a State court’ may be removed to federal court if the action is against `any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States . . . for or relating to any act under color of such office. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Pauline M.K. Young
  In a case captioned: Secretary, United States Department of Labor v. [read post]
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Tuesday held oral arguments in Braidwood Management v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
Benefits available to State employees and employees of a political subdivision of the State ordered to military service §§242 and 243 of New York State’s Military Law Ronald Miller, Esq., in an item posted in CCH’s Blog Employment Law Daily,* reports that a “city was denied summary judgment against an employee’s claim that it refused to reemploy her as a building custodian following her return from active… [read post]
The NDAA is a series of federal laws primarily specifying the annual budget and expenditures of the United States Department of Defense. [read post]
The NDAA is a series of federal laws primarily specifying the annual budget and expenditures of the United States Department of Defense. [read post]
The NDAA is a series of federal laws primarily specifying the annual budget and expenditures of the United States Department of Defense. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
Political activity is not an official duty required of a federal government employee. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm by Mike Underwood
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:03 am by David Fraser
At least in this instance, it places obligations only on the service provider to act within the United States....This case, for some Canadian readers will be reminiscent of the Canadian Federal Court decision in eBay Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 7:50 am
Maryland and the Foundation of Federal Authority in the Young Republic (Oxford), that makes the point that the Bank of the United States was scarcely the unambiguous "federal instrumentality" as described by Marshall. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Gene Quinn
The permanent injunction had been awarded by the United States Federal District Court for the District of New Hampshire, and relates to U.S. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:29 am by Franck Wobst
By Franck Wobst On Monday, May 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 5-to-4 decision that employers may require workers to accept individual arbitration for wage and hour and other workplace disputes rather than banding together to pursue their claims in class actions in federal or state courts. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm by Jason Rantanen
Congress also could adopt a “national contacts” standard that would allow a U.S. company to rely on a foreign misappropriator’s contacts with the United States a whole, rather than just the forum state, to establish personal jurisdiction over foreign defendants. [read post]