Search for: "National Labor Relations Board v. State of Oregon"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2020, 11:18 am
On February 7, 2020 the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) sued the State of Oregon in federal court seeking a declaratory judgement to invalidate a state statute that protects employees who refuse to attend lawful compulsory meetings held by employers during organizing campaigns from adverse employment action. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:00 am
Normally, we don’t post these kinds of updates from law firms, but this is so well done and has links to primary documents we crave (see bolded text under the fold), so here goes: Three recent unfair labor practice cases leveled against Indian nation casinos by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) have gone in three different directions. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm
In an era where nearly every American has a phone, a camera, a music player and a recorder on them at all times, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently held that an employee's recording of a meeting with management after having first been disallowed bringing a coworker into the meeting as a witness was protected activity under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:37 pm
United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlNational Labor Relations Board Chickasaw Nation D/B/A Winstar World Casino and International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 886, Affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (National Labor Relations Act)Patchak v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 12:36 pm
The amended law seems clearly at odds with long-standing National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) precedent (Babcock v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:38 pm
Morris relied on determinations by the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) in the D.R. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:47 am
Machinists v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Originally, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) was set to issue the final rule in December 2019, but it has not yet issued the final rule. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:53 am
Ross, Short Circuit on Turner v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 7:00 am
Supreme Court and the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) over whether arbitration agreements can include waivers of class action claims—the Supreme Court says they can; the NLRB says they violate federal labor laws allowing employees to engage in “concerted activity” relating to working conditions. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm
McKinney, the justices will consider what test courts should use to evaluate requests from the National Labor Relations Board for injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, which gives federal district courts the authority to grant preliminary injunctive relief as the court “deems just and proper”: the traditional (and stringent) four-factor test, or a more lenient standard. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:47 pm
May 21, 2018) (consolidated cases), returns to the status quo that existed for decades until the Obama National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) reversed course in 2012 and held that employment agreements that require employees to individually arbitrate disputes violate the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:47 pm
May 21, 2018) (consolidated cases), returns to the status quo that existed for decades until the Obama National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) reversed course in 2012 and held that employment agreements that require employees to individually arbitrate disputes violate the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm
Detroit Board of Education, the Court identified two state interests sufficiently compelling to justify mandatory union fees – “labor peace” and the related interest in preventing nonunion workers from free-riding on the union’s statutorily mandated duty to represent all unit members fairly. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries directing the lower court to reconsider its ruling against a bakery owner who refused to make a case for a same-sex wedding “seem[s] to invite the state court to scour the record below in search of some expression of hostility to the baker’s religious beliefs that might justify letting her off the hook in this current violation of the state’s human rights law. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
Board of Education. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
Related: Q & A: Hon. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
The authors have conducted the first national study of workplace violence against young people in our country. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:24 am
The board member resigned. [read post]
