Search for: "National Prohibition Cases"
Results 141 - 160
of 20,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2020, 3:30 pm
The recent United States Supreme Court case, Bostock v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 9:15 am
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) [official website] determined 3-1 [case materials] Tuesday that student assistants working at private colleges are statutory employees covered by the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:23 pm
‘Final order’ – either: –Approval; –Approval subject to conditions – remedial measures to protect UK national security, which could include imposition of a compliance/oversight monitor or supervisor within the companyxi; or –Prohibition – or unwinding of a transaction. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 6:33 am
” National injunctions prohibit the federal government from enforcing a law or regulation against anyone, not just against the plaintiff. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 9:33 am
Yesterday’s settlement of a case brought by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) sheds some light on the subject. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:54 am
Although the District Court in New Mexico did agree that the case would move faster in Pennsylvania, taking all things into consideration, it denied the request stating that it would inconvenience the Navajo Nation. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 7:58 am
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 "prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 12:00 pm
The justices heard oral arguments in four cases, all of which called on the Court to interpret federal laws, including the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, the Mineral Leasing Act, the Federal Immigration, and the Nationality Act and the Prison Litigation Reform Act. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 7:40 am
Earlier coverage of the case is available from the "School Law" blog of Education Week; from Texas Lawyer's "Tex Parte Blog" in posts titled "Principals not entitled to qualified immunity in religious viewpoint discrimination case" and "Candy cane case continues with Paul Clement representing old-school amici"; and from the "Legal Clips" blog of the National School Boards Association (here and here). [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110 (CanLII) and Canadian National Railway Company v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
The determination must be made on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
The determination must be made on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
14 May 2013, 5:42 am
Minnesota has one of the nation's broadest statutory prohibitions of "aiding suicide." [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:36 pm
Specific cases have linked Canadian officials and security organizations to human rights abuses involving Canadians at the hands of governments in other countries. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:45 pm
The first case is Denezpi v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:01 am
The case addresses whether Section 103(c) of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of 1980 prohibits the National Park Service from exercising regulatory control over State, Native Corporation, and private Alaska land physically located within the boundaries of the National Park System. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 1:10 pm
Although more burdensome, this indicates that the FAR Council will not expect foreign affiliates, parents or subsidiaries to meet the telecommunications equipment prohibition in any case. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 1:10 pm
Although more burdensome, this indicates that the FAR Council will not expect foreign affiliates, parents or subsidiaries to meet the telecommunications equipment prohibition in any case. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 1:48 pm
§§ 2709(c) and 3511(b)–the provisions that prohibit the recipients of “national security letters” from disclosing the fact that they received an NSL (or the contents thereof) and that provide recipients with a minimal opportunity to seek judicial review of NSLs, respectively–on First Amendment and separation of powers grounds. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:49 pm
The National Labor Relations Board has announced its decision in the case of D.R. [read post]
