Search for: "National Railroad Passenger Corp.," Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2011, 2:59 am
First came the  state warning, then retail removals, next was the recall, followed by national warnings, and now the first lawsuit. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  With passenger service rudimentary into the 1930s, those subsidies were needed to keep commercial aviation aloft. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 10:11 pm by Jon Gelman
• Rail Safety: In 2008, Senator Lautenberg’s overhaul of railroad safety laws was signed into law, requiring railroads to improve safety by limiting hours of service, improving grade crossing safety and requiring new safety technology that will improve safety for rail passengers, automobile drivers and communities near rail lines. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
National Railroad Passenger Corp., 619 F.3d 729 (7th Cir. 2010), which held that “a treating physician who has offered to provide expert testimony as to the cause of the plaintiff’s injury, but who did not make that determination in the course of providing treatment, should be deemed to be one ‘retained or especially employed to provide expert testimony in the case,’ and thus is required to submit an expert report in accordance with Rule… [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:10 pm
 The Court also held that the continuing-violation doctrine does not apply to disparate impact theories of discrimination because of the Supreme Court’s decision in National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
Gregoire, wherein the Fourth Department held that a passenger in a vehicle could be held liable for verbally or physically distracting a driver immediately prior to an accident. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:41 am by Fred Goldsmith
National Railroad Passenger Corp., 2009 WL 2025703 (Pa. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 7:26 am by Greg Mersol
National Railroad Passenger Corp., Civil Action No. 99-2927 (D.D.C., Apr. 26, 2018). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
A hostile environment claim "involves repeated conduct," not "[d]iscrete acts such as termination, failure to promote, denial of transfer, or refusal to hire" (National Railroad Passenger Corporation v Morgan, 536 US 101, 114). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
A hostile environment claim "involves repeated conduct," not "[d]iscrete acts such as termination, failure to promote, denial of transfer, or refusal to hire" (National Railroad Passenger Corporation v Morgan, 536 US 101, 114). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
A hostile environment claim "involves repeated conduct," not "[d]iscrete acts such as termination, failure to promote, denial of transfer, or refusal to hire" (National Railroad Passenger Corporation v Morgan, 536 US 101, 114). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
A hostile environment claim "involves repeated conduct," not "[d]iscrete acts such as termination, failure to promote, denial of transfer, or refusal to hire" (National Railroad Passenger Corporation v Morgan, 536 US 101, 114). [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:13 pm by Deepak Gupta
He was counsel of record on an amicus brief for the American Association for Justice supporting the employees in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm by Kirk Jenkins
For another jurisdiction, if it should happen to lay hold of the actor, to treat him according to its own notions rather than those of the place where he did the acts, not only would be unjust, but would be an interference with the authority of another sovereign, contrary to the comity of nations, which the other state concerned justly might resent. [read post]