Search for: "National Restoration Co. v. Merit General Contractors"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2014, 2:58 am
The Operator is generally nominated owing to its participating interests (stake) in the Contractor or due to its expertise. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
A licensed public insurance adjuster is expressly prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in the reconstruction, repair, or restoration of damaged property that is the subject of a claim adjusted by the license holder; acting as a public insurance adjuster and a contractor on the same claim is a statutorily-defined conflict of interest. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
A licensed public insurance adjuster is expressly prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in the reconstruction, repair, or restoration of damaged property that is the subject of a claim adjusted by the license holder; acting as a public insurance adjuster and a contractor on the same claim is a statutorily-defined conflict of interest. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
As for CREW, I am sympathetic with the view that the identities of government contractors should generally be known to the public. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Most significantly, the clients' causes of action for barratry under the original version of Texas Government Code § 82.065 may proceed in the trial court, as the court of appeals held that none of the multiple bases that the defendants had urged in their summary judgment motion merited dismissal. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Most significantly, the causes of action for barratry under the original version of Texas Government Code § 82.065 may proceed in the trial court, as the court of appeals held that none of the multiple bases that the defendants had raised in their summary judgment motion merited its dismissal. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Murphy Oil Appeal – Dismisses Appeal on Procedural Grounds, Not Merits. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Murphy Oil Appeal – Dismisses Appeal on Procedural Grounds, Not Merits. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am
In that case, Miami Herald Co v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
Agency for International Development, which dealt with a virtually identical claim, Sotomayor’s opinion rejected the group’s First Amendment claim on the merits. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 3:10 pm
Youmans, 2015 WL 6813669 (June 15, 2015) (following Nosal), with Enhanced Recovery Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
In fact, the only conditions the Board may have imposed were general conditions applicable to all registrations. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:08 pm
See generally L. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding the application of “facilities” to unlined landfills, the court, relying on Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding the application of “facilities” to unlined landfills, the court, relying on Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
In inspections, the EPA said it found violations by Fafard, FRE Building Co. and Benchmark Engineering Corp. at sites in Holliston, Natick, Uxbridge, Milford, Marlborough and elsewhere. [read post]
