Search for: "National Union v. Arnold"
Results 21 - 40
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2020, 7:01 am
In 1995, famous Russian mathematician Vladimir Igorevich Arnold wondered whether three-dimensional objects with only two equilibrium points exist: one stable (S) and one unstable (I) equilibrium point (1,1). [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm
Arnold J of the UK Patents Court to conclude in [2018] EWHC 2416 (Pat) that one part of the two-pronged test established by the CJEU in Teva v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
Lord Justice Arnold commented the presentation by asking how we should strike the balance between innovation and unfair monopolies. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am
Freelance photographers tend to cite the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) rates when quantifying damages, but the discussion seems to indicate that standard picture library rates (generally lower than the NUJ rates) are the preferred starting point.However, all is not lost for claimants. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:54 am
" (Bonz Group (Pty) Ltd v Cooke [1994] 3 N.Z.L.R. 216). [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:31 am
It just a few months ago that this blog reported on the Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev in the Sky v SkyKick, C-371/18 case.important A referral from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales made by Arnold J (as he then was), the Sky case is probably the most important referral in the EU trade mark field made over the past few years. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
It was in that judgment, delivered in January 2017, that the Judge referred the question that he previously referred in Actavis v Sanofi to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
Referral and AG’s Opinion Arnold J in the English Court referred five questions to the CJEU, which the AG opined as follows: Question 1: Can an EU or national trade mark be declared invalid, in whole or in part, on the grounds that the specification of goods and services lack sufficient clarity and precision? [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
Referral and AG’s Opinion Arnold J in the English Court referred five questions to the CJEU, which the AG opined as follows: Question 1: Can an EU or national trade mark be declared invalid, in whole or in part, on the grounds that the specification of goods and services lack sufficient clarity and precision? [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
Referral and AG’s Opinion Arnold J in the English Court referred five questions to the CJEU, which the AG opined as follows: Question 1: Can an EU or national trade mark be declared invalid, in whole or in part, on the grounds that the specification of goods and services lack sufficient clarity and precision? [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:42 am
Referral and AG’s Opinion Arnold J in the English Court referred five questions to the CJEU, which the AG opined as follows: Question 1: Can an EU or national trade mark be declared invalid, in whole or in part, on the grounds that the specification of goods and services lack sufficient clarity and precision? [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 7:27 am
The second complaint was filed by the National Treasury Employees Union and three of its members. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
V. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:24 pm
Late in the game, the FMC even bought a financial institution (UNION FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, now defunct) outright to have even greater control over the make-money-quick scheme and mix its own harvest of high-interest subprime lemons into the securitization pool in 2017. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Tosshan Ramgolam reports on our own Kat Eleonora Rosati holding the official book launch for her new book, Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union. [read post]
4 May 2019, 6:15 am
SpecialKat Hayleigh Bosher analyses the decision of the fifth chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Case T‑215/17) regarding figurative trade marks representing fruits.Hans Eriksson provides a report on a Swedish decision regarding black-and-white representation of signs.PatentsIn Your FRANDly Update: Ericsson v HTC, FRAND in India, jurisdictional issues (again), Unwired Planet v Huawei, ASUS v Interdigital and more, AmeriKat Annsley Merelle… [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 10:30 am
Justice Richard Arnold of the England & Wales High Court (previously mentioned on this blog for his invalidation of a Motorola junk patent and a Nokia v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:02 pm
Sir Richard Arnold would like to see a mandatory list of copyright limitations. [read post]
