Search for: "National Union v. Arnold"
Results 61 - 80
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
How two years flies past | Gilead triumphant as Court of Appealupholds Arnold J in Idenix's Sovaldi appeal |BREAKING: CJEU follows AG and holds French law on out-of-print books contrary to EU law | Again on the first post-GS Media national decision | Top 5 things IP lawyers must remember about English contract law | Monday Miscellany | Around the IP Blogs |Never Too Late 122 [week ending on Sunday 13 November] | Is depositing better than sequencing? [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:18 am
What kind of jurisdiction does Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive, as implemented into the laws of Member States, confer upon national courts? [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
SPC applications are made to national IPOs who are not medicines authorities subject to the Medicinal Products Directive. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:54 pm
The reasoning of the CJEU in GAT v LuK was equally applicable here. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
What this provision requires was clarified [as recalled at para 59] by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its 2011 decision in L'Oréal:1. [read post]
30 May 2016, 10:00 am
.* Which national laws will UPC witnesses be subject to? [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
Arnold J did not seem too convinced]. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive explanation of trademarks | Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
This morning Lord Neuberger handed down the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in the Trunki case, PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A… [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
The floor goes to Darren.* Arnold J rules that shape of KitKat chocolate bar cannot be registered as a trade markFollowing a reference for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) [here and here], the famous KitKatcase got back to the High Court of England and Wales, where Arnold J tried to apply the ambiguous guidelines of the CJEU – and wondered how the latter has not really got the questions he had posed. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:09 am
As IPKat readers will remember, there are two cases currently pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), ie GS Media [here] and Filmspeler, which will require everybody’s favourite court to address this very issue [here and here tables summarising the state of the art regarding linking in Europe at the moment].In the meantime, Katfriend and IP enthusiast Nedim Malovic (Stockholm University) has provided a recap of what has happened since… [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:47 am
" (para 67)Yesterday Arnold J gave judgment in this saga (Nestlé v Cadbury [2016] EWHC 50 (Ch)), and dismissed Nestlé's appeal.WTF?!? [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
Just think of the forthcoming Batman v Superman ... [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:35 am
The US Register of Copyrights, the EU Commissioner for the Digital Economy & Society, the Canadian Government, High Court Judge Sir Richard Arnold, the Pirate Party, and other commentators too numerous to mention individually, have all advanced the need for reform of this most complicated of the various IP disciplines. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:10 am
This case seems to begetting out of hand ...To recap, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling on Wednesday 16 September in the '3D chocolate finger' trade mark case, Case C-215/14 Nestlé v Cadbury [noted by Eleonora here]. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:25 am
This was a bill that was vetoed by then-governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:10 am
This Kat has also posted an item there on British Gas v VanClare, an instructive extempore decision of Arnold J on whether and when bifurcation is possible in England and Wales. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
In this respect this Kat has pondered whether Mr Justice Arnold’s decision Warner -Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) is a good one in respect of the interpretation of Swiss style claims (Katpost here). [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
” The distinction between “general” and “specific” was considered by the CJEU in the eBay case and subsequently by the High Court in Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v British Telecommunications Plc ([2011] EWHC 1981 (Ch)) in which Arnold J held that an order intended to block access by BT’s subscribers to a particular website involved in copyright infringement did not fall foul of Article 15. [read post]
