Search for: "National Union v. Arnold" Results 101 - 120 of 163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
The Spain’s action gave birth to Cases C-146/13 and C-147/13 Kingdom of Spain v European Parliament and Council of the European Union. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
4) ISPs should bear implementation costs ... and may think of preventative filtering as a cheaper solutionSimilarly to what stated in his earlier judgment in 20C Fox v BT (No 2), Arnold J took the view that "the rightholders should pay the costs of an unopposed application ... [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers, Journalism and regulation There were two published PCC adjudications this week: Martin Sewell v The Cambridge Student: A clause 1 complaint in respect of an online story accusing a Cambridge University research associate of having “explicitly endorsed National Socialism” was upheld. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 6:46 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Big’ murder case over police Charter violationsHusband Beaters Wal-Mart violated Quebec’s labour code by closing store after worker unionization attempt, court rulesSupreme Court sides with Quebec unionized Wal-Mart workers - Rachel Spence, Law ClerkVisit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net Visit our website: www.wiselaw.net [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:23 am
"All this is compliant with the GAT and Folien decisions and the Corte di Cassazione ruling, as well the UK decision in Joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) and Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [here]. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:57 am by Eleonora Rosati
 At the national level, also super-learned Mr Justice Arnold said [in his 2013 decision in SAS v WPL, at para 27] that:"In the light of a number of recent judgments of the CJEU, it may be arguable that it is not a fatal objection to a claim that copyright subsists in a particular work that the work is not one of the kinds of work listed in section 1(1)(a) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents 1988 and defined elsewhere in that Act." [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:15 am
Case C-535/13 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v Maria Patmanidi SA is a request by the Monomeles Protodikeio Athinon (Greece) to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling on the following question: What is the scope of ... [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
Following earlier judgment in FAPL v Sky, the judge found that both the websites infringed the Claimants' right of communication the public. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 9:07 am by Veronika Gaertner
 Jan von Hein: “The applicability of Art. 5 No. 3 Brussels I-Regulation to damages caused by multiple tortfeasors”  In Melzer v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
This question related to whether the combination product is protected by the amended patent and stems from the idea advanced by Actavis and by Arnold J in Actavis v Sanofi that the combination product may need to embody a separate inventive advance. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:33 am by Graham Smith
  They said much the same for use of a trade mark in L’Oreal v eBay. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
 Panellists are Mr Justice Arnold, Chris Wadlow, Phillip Johnson and Birgit Clark. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
This issue seemed so straightforward till the Court of Justice of the European Union got its hands on it and now, following its ruling on smell-alike scent marks in Case C-487/07 L'Oréal v Bellure [on which see Katpost here], while we know what we can't do, we're not so sure of what we can do. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
Arnold J allowed the appeal in part. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:12 am
Merpel thinks that the explanations for different national rates of increase or decrease could teach us more about what businesses do, and what they think trade marks do, than almost anything else] • The impact of potential European Union policy-wide influence on the copyright framework [Why 'potential', wonders Merpel. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
When Arnold arrived in Sacramento (I know this from an informed Republican friend), he held serious but private talks with the conservative leaders who control the GOP in California, much as they do nationally. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
 That application led to a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-323/09, noted by the IPKat here, then came back for trial before Arnold J in June of this year at [2012] EWHC 1722 (Ch). when the judge gave permission to Interflora to run one of two pilot surveys which it wished to conduct. [read post]