Search for: "National Wildlife Federation et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2021, 9:00 am
” On March 4, 2021, in United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:24 am
 The National Marine Fisheries Service has jurisdiction over anadromous fish, including steelhead. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:29 pm by WIMS
      Plaintiffs-Appellants Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 2:13 am by Jon L. Gelman
Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 2:20 am by Chijioke Okorie
The scope is quite broad as it covers agricultural goods, non-food agricultural goods, natural goods including rock and mineral resources, wildlife plots, et al; handicrafts and industrial goods, agricultural products and inland marine fisheries, hunting products, products derived from animals without the use of special preparation or preservation, and products of vegetable origin. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:24 pm by Steve Davies
They then use those fees to fund even more lawsuits against the Fish and Wildlife Service, and occasionally even against the National Marine Fisheries Service, though NMFS was mentioned sparingly during the hearing. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 8:28 am by lburchi@lawbc.com
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) or the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) before registering cyantraniliprole (CTP) under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm by Steve Davies
National Marine Fisheries Service, 524 F.3d 917, 931 (9th Cir. 2007)). [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company will pay $32,500 for the alleged CERCLA violation for failure to immediately notify the National Response Center (NRC) of the release. [read post]