Search for: "Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Grant"
Results 101 - 120
of 288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
Natural Resources Defense Council commands that a reviewing judge defer to an agency’s interpretation of a statute the agency administers if (1) the statutory provision at issue is ambiguous and (2) the agency’s interpretation is reasonable. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:27 am
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc., which arose in a challenge by an environmental organization to a Reagan-era rule by the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc., courts have deferred to agencies’ reasonable interpretation of statutes. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:39 am
At the same time, under a Republican administration and a Republican Congress it would be hard for PTAB to get a whole lot more resources. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm
Lawson Rock & Oil, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
It began the year by granting review in Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
The world of directors’ and officers’ liability is always dynamic, but 2017 was a particularly eventful year in the D&O liability arena. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 8:42 am
Natural Resource Defense Council, Inc. only as a back-up. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:03 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), discussed in John H. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), is owed to an interpretation of language prohibiting billboards that display “flashing,” “intermittent,” or “moving” lights, contained in agreements between the Federal Highway Administration and individual states, as announced in a guidance memorandum issued by the FHWA, or whether deference, if any, is owed under Skidmore v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Piecemealing Aptos Council v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Piecemealing Aptos Council v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm
Every year just after Labor Day, I take a step back and survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and D&O insurance. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:18 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-43 (1984), the Court determined that the statutory language establishing the exemptions, section 13(a)(1) of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:18 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-43 (1984), the Court determined that the statutory language establishing the exemptions, section 13(a)(1) of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 6:58 pm
North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
Piecemealing Aptos Council v. [read post]
