Search for: "Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitioner, v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2017, 1:45 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)] Administrator Pruitt leaving chlorpyrifos tolerances in effect when he did not and cannot determine that chlorpyrifos is safe under the Food Quality Protection Act. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:32 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7 (2008), where the Court held (in the context of a NEPA challenge) that the party seeking a preliminary injunction must show a likelihood—not just a possibility—of irreparable harm absent an injunction. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:57 am
Backstrom On August 7, 2019, the League of United Latin American Citizens, Pesticide Action Network North America, Natural Resources Defense Council, and other petitioners (Petitioners) filed a new petition in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals seeking judicial review of United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) orders denying their request that EPA revoke all tolerances and cancel… [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
That alternative is backed by a diverse group that includes The Bay Institute, the Contra Costa Council, Defenders of Wildlife, Environmental Entrepreneurs, the Planning and Conservation League, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the San Diego County Water Authority, Alameda County Water District, Contra Costa Water District, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Otay Water District, the City of San Diego and the San Francisco Public… [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al., 467 U.S. 837 (1984) and Chevron deference did not play a large role in the Court’s decision, which was concerned to some extent with IRS regulations. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
Environmental Protection Agency (2007). [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) in December 2007 by the State of Arizona pursuant to section 189(d) of the CAA. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Natural Resources Defense Council (Granted )Docket: 11-460Issue(s): When water flows from one portion of a river that is navigable water of the United States, through a concrete channel or other engineered improvement in the river constructed for flood and stormwater control as part of a municipal separate storm sewer system, into a lower portion of the same river, whether there can be a “discharge” from an “outfall” under… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Natural Resources Defense Council (Granted )Docket: 11-460Issue(s): When water flows from one portion of a river that is navigable water of the United States, through a concrete channel or other engineered improvement in the river constructed for flood and stormwater control as part of a municipal separate storm sewer system, into a lower portion of the same river, whether there can be a “discharge” from an “outfall” under… [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm
State Air Resources Bd. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 77. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am
On the other side, defending the propriety of the appellate forum, are the federal government and several more environmental groups, including the Natural Resources Defense Council and the National Wildlife Federation. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
UPDATE Lead Agency/Responsible Agency We Advocate Thorough Environmental Review v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 6:26 am
The United States, along with fellow-respondents the Natural Resources Defense Council and the National Wildlife Federation, argues that the rule does fall within the provisions that trigger direct appellate review. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) when its employees defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Exemptions Protect Tustin Ranch v. [read post]
