Search for: "Neal v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2010, 6:37 am
I am happy to see that my friend and classmate, Neal Katyal, is arguing for the United States as amicus, and also delighted that the Department of Justice is supporting the constitutionality of the Arizona program at issue. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:57 am
United States, 536 U.S. 1014 (2002). [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a court can freeze a criminal defendant’s “untainted” assets when the defendant’s “tainted” assets have been spent or cannot be located. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:26 am
Bielski, Case No. 22-105 (oral argument Mar. 21, 2023, in the Supreme Court of the United States). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Constitutional meaning is hotly contested in the United States today. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
Despite the recent announcement that Volkswagen had agreed to a $14.7 billion settlement with the United States arising out of allegations made by the U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:05 am
Jackson filed her brief in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:18 am
That is when the United States Supreme Court struck down the state’s anti-sodomy law in Lawrence v Texas, a case arising after sheriff’s deputies in the Houston area charged 2 men with a misdemeanor for having sex in an apartment. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 6:01 pm
Why on earth “would it have looked bad” for the Solicitor General to be involved in the most important case the United States has argued in a decade, where the entire DOJ was coordinating a defense from day one? [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
United States, makes that point only then to go on and draw the distinction. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” In a brief per curiam decision, the justices also dismissed United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 1:06 pm
Sentencing was handed down by United States District Judge Jeffery V. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:22 am
Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal will argue on behalf of the United States in Richmond. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am
In his Proclamation 5517 (1986), he justified this exclusion on the ground that he “found that the unrestricted entry into the United States as immigrants by Cuban citizens would . . . be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Neal Kaytal of the Solicitor General's office will argue as amicus curiae for the United States in support of the petitioners. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:51 am
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Sarah Harrington argued for the United States as amicus curiae in support of Chester. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:45 am
United States, 409 F.3d 646, 652-54 (4th Cir. 2005). [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:30 am
The revised EO applies only to noncitizen visa applicants with no previous ties to the United States—a group with scant, if any, statutory or constitutional rights. [read post]
