Search for: "Ned Foley" Results 101 - 120 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2010, 11:31 am by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
UPDATE: Ned Foley has written a Moritz comment which asks: "What exactly is reconciliation and why is Emmer presently unsatisfied? [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:51 am by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
The latest from Connecticut, which Ned Foley keeps on yellow alert.... [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:49 pm by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
Ned Foley: "As we watch events unfold this year concerning the unsettled control of the state senate in New York, and the several elections on which that control depends, let's hope that the current resolution contains nothing like the ugliness... [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:42 am by Danielle Citron
  But as Professor Ned Foley noted at this Friday’s Privacy, Democracy & Elections conference sponsored by the William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, paper is the least trustworthy option: election officials and poll workers have difficulty counting accurately and paper ballots bring a long history of tampering and corruption. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:35 pm by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
Ned Foley has posted this important comment at Election Law@Moritz.... [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:36 am by Steve Hall
Michael Fedele, Tom Foley, Oz Griebel, Larry DeNardis and Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton — do not favor the repeal of the law and have said they would veto any attempt to so. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:30 am by Steve Hall
Ned Lamont, a Democrat who led Malloy 28 percent to 18 percent in a recent Quinnipiac poll, also would not have vetoed the death penalty ban, according to spokeswoman Justine Sessions. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 2:13 pm by Legal Talk Network
Craig Williams welcomes Professor Ned Foley, Professor of Law at Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law and Professor Adam Winkler, Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law, to discuss this Supreme Court ruling and the impact this ruling will have on state, judicial and legislative elections. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:56 am
  Please join me as I welcome Professor Ned Foley, Professor of Law at Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law and Professor Adam Winkler, Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law, to discuss this Supreme Court ruling and the impact this ruling will have on state, judicial and legislative elections.Give a click on the podcast icon below and give a listen to the analysis of this important decision. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:03 am
Ned Foley offers these thoughts.... [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 3:19 pm
Ned Foley has written this thoughtful post.... [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:41 pm
Ned Foley offers this well-deserved criticism of this morning's WSJ editorial on Coleman-Franken.... [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 1:10 pm
Ned Foley: "If the Minnesota Supreme Court rules for Franken, it would be wrong to jump to the conclusion that the court inevitably must be biased against Coleman. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 10:31 pm
The lawyers for both sides would be crazy not to meticulously study this blog post/law review article in disguise by Ned. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 8:56 am
Ned Foley (a must-read) Star-Tribune AP Minnesota Public Radio Pioneer Press MinnPost (on Pawlenty) Bloomberg Minnesota Independent Politico Nate Silver (on attorneys' fees) MSNBC (on the GOP's silence, suggesting to me a potential throwing in of the towel) I posted... [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:03 am
Ned Foley offers this comment on the NY-20 race.... [read post]