Search for: "Ned Foley" Results 121 - 140 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2009, 11:01 pm
More analysis from MinnPost (quoting Ned Foley extensively) and Ned's own analysis.... [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:17 pm
Another must-read post from Ned Foley on the Coleman-Franken contest.... [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 6:39 pm
Ned Foley's latest on Minnesota.... [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
Ned Foley has this must-read post on putting the Franken-Coleman dispute in a larger context. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
The article incorrectly states that Ned Foley is a political scientist.... [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 8:03 pm
Ned Foley offers this comment on this ruling of the 3-judge court considering the Franken-Coleman election contest.... [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 1:24 am
  A January 14, 2009 memorandum from Foley & Lardner law firm discussing the Roscoe case can be found here. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 7:45 am
Ned Foley has written this Roll Call oped ($). [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 4:25 am
Ned Foley has written this guest post for my Fixing Election Administration series: A Visible Reason that Precludes a Victory Lap I generally agree with much of what Doug Chapin says in matters of election administration and specifically agree with... [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Ned Foley offers the following guest post in my Fixing Election Administration series: Election reform should embrace a long-term perspective and include non-partisan administration of the voting process. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 3:55 pm
Ned Foley has this must-read post on the likely recount in the Minnesota Senate race.... [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:15 pm
The most likely form that this will take this year is a fight over provisional ballots, absentee ballots, military ballots, and residual votes, as my colleague Ned Foley suggests in this post. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:15 pm
The most likely form that this will take this year is a fight over provisional ballots, absentee ballots, military ballots, and residual votes, as my colleague Ned Foley suggests in this post. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:37 pm
Ned Foley notes that the en banc vote appears to be 9-6, with Judge Rogers not yet having voted. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 5:31 pm
And Ned Foley corrects an inaccuracy in the story... [read post]