Search for: "Nederlander v Nederlander"
Results 101 - 120
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2023, 10:47 am
HvJ EU 24 november 2022, ECLI:EU:C:2022:923, NIPR 2022-549 (Tilman/Unilever) / p. 51-58 Abstract Tilman v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:00 pm
Soms dient zich een bijzonder geval aan, zoals de zaak die speelde voor de President van de Rechtbank Amsterdam (23 april 1992; rolnummer KG 92/847 V). [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:29 am
Zie voor een kwestie die in Nederland speelde: Hof Arnhem-Leeuwarden 20 januari 2015 (ECLI:NL:GHARL:2015:302). [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Suffice it to say that the current framework, as applied by the ECJ in its decisions in the GAT and Roche Nederlands cases, appears unsuitable. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
The Social Media Law Bulletion notes that, in the case of Palomino v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S was decided on 18 September, but this Kat -- who has been beset by a succession of happy distractions -- has only just got round to writing it up for the weblog. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm
Gongadze v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 9:19 pm
Reference on Art. 1 Brussels I Regulation (C-406/09; Realchemie Nederland BV v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:59 am
A little more than a year ago this blog reported that a new reference for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been filed by the Rechtbank Midden-Nederland (District Court, Central Netherlands, Netherlands). [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 3:40 pm
" [1] Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland, N.V. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 3:20 am
/ p. 532-542 Abstract This article discusses the recent judgment of the District Court of The Hague in Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
UPC Nederland (Netherlands, District Court of Utrecht)Greenbaum v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 3:20 pm
In Shorenstein Hays-Nederland Theaters LLC Appeals, Nos. 596, 2018 and 620-2018 (Del. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 9:44 am
(See Case C-452/12 Nipponkoa Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd v Interzuid Transport BV EU:C:2013:858, [2014] I.L.Pr. 10, [36]; See also to similar effect, Case C-533/08 TNT Express Nederland BV v AXA Versicherung AG EU:C:2010:243, [2010] I.L.Pr. 35, [49]) It is argued that the Hartley–Dogauchi Report’s interpretative approach has much to commend it as it follows the path of least resistance by narrowly construing the right to sue in a non-chosen forum as an exception… [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:07 pm
This position is in line with the prevailing opinion in Japan according to which punitive damages are in principle contrary to Japanese public policy due to the fundamental difference in nature (civil v. criminal) and function (compensatory v. punitive/sanction) (For a general overview on the debate in Japan, see Béligh Elbalti, “Foreign Judgments Recognition and Enforcement in Civil and Commercial Matters in Japan”, Osaka University Law Review, Vol. 66, 2019,… [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
ECtHR 8 November 2005, Bader and others v Sweden, par. 47; ECtHR 22 June 2006, D. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:48 am
SpainGoogle v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 7:24 am
Hoe bepaal je de inhoud van de redelijkheid en billijkheid? [read post]
